Could be that “Carried Away” is my favourite Alice Munro story.
Not only because Louisa is a librarian. (But that certainly helps.)
“The Librarian’s desk was in the archway between the front and back rooms. The books were on shelves set in rows in the back room. Green-shaded lamps, with long pull cords, dangled down in the aisles between.”
This librarian is a quintessential Munro heroine.
“Arthur remembered years ago some matter brought up at the Council Meeting about buying sixty-watt bulbs instead of forty. This Librarian was the one who had requested that, and they had done it.”
Arthur recognizes her practical nature, the pursuit of light bulbs which are better for reading, but he comes to see another side of Louisa as well.
Independent. Romantic. Professional. Passionate.
But she was not always a librarian.
Once upon a time, she was in love.
And, then, once upon another time, she recalled that first time with something-like-regret-and-fondness.
“Carried Away” slips across time, from one love affair and romantic (and not-so-romantic) encounter to another, from one disappointment and loss to the next.
The story begins with letters, between Louisa and a man from Carstairs, who is overseas in the war.
But she has written other letters, to another man. And her memories of these past letters overlap.
Readers meet Louisa when she sits in the dining room of the Commercial Hotel to read his letters and she sits in the Ladies Parlor to write her replies.
Paradoxically, Louisa is stationery (but in a transitional place, a hotel) when she recalls the motion those other letters provoked.
“Her last letter had been firm and stoical, and some consciousness of herself as a heroine of love’s tragedy went with her around the country as she hauled her display cases up and down the stairs of small hotels and talked about Paris styles and said that her sample hats were bewitching , and drank her solitary glass of wine.”
Louisa took to the road to escape those other letters (more accurately to escape the reality that there were to be no more letters), only to find herself the recipient of — and sender of — letters once more.
The soldier does not know her name when he first writes; the librarian does not recall what he looks like when she receives his first letter.
“Now she felt what everybody else did – a constant fear and misgiving and at the same time this addictive excitement. You could look up from your life of the moment and feel the world crackling beyond the walls.”
This she felt because of the war.
This she felt because of the letters.
They got carried away.
She tells the story of the soldier’s letters to another salesman who stays at the Commercial Hotel, after those letters, too, have slipped into the past.
“One of these was Jim Frarey, who sold typewriters and office equipment and books and all sorts of stationery supplies. He was a fair-haired, rather round-shouldered but strongly built man in his middle forties. You would think by the look of him that he sold something heavier and more important in the masculine world, like farm implements.”
Readers have a clear picture of Jim Frarey, which distracts from the fact that there is no clear picture of either the man who first set Louisa on the road or the soldier who wrote her letters overseas.
She describes — for Jim Frarey and for readers — how, when the war ended, she expected the soldier to visit the library.
“When she entered the Town Hall she always felt he might be there before her, leaning up against the wall awaiting her arrival. Sometimes she felt it so strongly she saw a shadow that she mistook for a man.”
She describes how that never happened.
“She picked up each book separately, and shook it as if she expected something to fall out. She ran her fingers in between the pages. The bottom part of her face was working in an unsightly way, as if she was chewing at the inside of her cheeks.”
She describes what happened instead.
“She had made fresh starts before and things had not tuned out as she had hoped, but she believed in the swift decision, the unforeseen intervention, the uniqueness of her fate.”
She describes what came before, and then readers learn what would come next.
(Alice Munro’s stories sometimes demand unusual verb tenses; “Carried Away” has a timeline readers can establish with a single reading, but Louisa-at-the-end-of-the-story appears to inhabit all of these pasts at once in a muddled-but-painfully-clear present that is still, somehow, conditional.)
Louisa’s story slips across love stories and near-love stories.
Arthur slips into the story and offers another perspective on Louisa, on the almost accidental way that one can stumble onto another book and another love affair.
“He was pleasantly mystified by the thought of grown people coming and going here, steadily reading books. Week after week, one book after another, a whole life long. He himself read a book once in a while, when somebody recommended it, and usually he enjoyed it, and then he read magazines, to keep up with things, and never thought about reading a book until another one came along, in this almost accidental way.”
Letters. Spanish Flu. Accidents. Tolpuddle Martyrs. “‘I knew you right away,’ he said. ‘In spite of — well, many years.'”
But Louisa doesn’t recognize him. They have met by accident. It might never have happened.
Have you been reading any Alice Munro stories?
NOTE: Spoilers in the comments below.
Note: This is part of a series of posts on Alice Munro’s stories, as I read through her work-to-date. She is one of my MRE authors and this is the first story in Open Secrets. Please feel free to check the schedule and join in, for the series, or for a single story; I would love the company.
Enigmatic clues and details.
Enough to tease the reader with possibilities, but not enough to completely solve the question of whodunit, like the story of the missing girl on the hiking trip.
Yet the answer is there right in front of us, or isn’t it?
That’s just it, that we are not even sure of that: makes for endless rereading possibilities!
[…] “Carried Away” Alice Munro […]
Continuing to be puzzled by my own puzzlement, I looked into Robert Thacker’s Alice Munro Writing Her Lives and found a reference to a discussion between Peter Gzowski and Munro at the time Open Secrets was published. It seems the original ending to the story was different and Munro was not satisfied with it, “so she wrote the present ending”. “When speaking of one such ending in Open Secrets, Gzowski said that he was not sure he wanted to know just what happened. Replying, Munro said, “That’s good. That’s really the response I want to get. I want to move away from what happened, to the possibility of this happening, or that happening, and a kind of idea that life is not just made up of the facts, of the things that happened….But all the things that happen, the things that might have happened, the kind of alternate life that can almost seem to be accompanying what we call our real lives. I wanted to get all that, sort of, working together.” I truly believe she did that and it feels great knowing that it’s alright to be uncertain sometimes about what a story means. Thanks so much for encouraging me to reread this collection.
Thanks for the quotes! I’ve read/heard somewhere that she often had difficulty with the endings of her stories, wanting them to be something other than they were, often opting for open-endedness.
I’ve added a spoiler warning to the post so that we can discuss the ending more specifically, and other parts of the story. There are so many aspects of the story that I didn’t want to reveal in the post, but leaving them out glosses over the story’s complexity too.
I’m curious about the reference to the horses, which also appear in her discussion with Jim, who mentioned that, living down the street from the undertaker, he often saw horses pass by. I wonder if the sound of their bells, the statement that they move into the distance until they cannot be heard, is intended to suggest that Louisa’s disappointments (over her relationship with the doctor and with Jack) have faded, too. But that doesn’t fit with what we know of Louisa, because those earlier experiences haunt her so; she even imagines seeing someone else entirely when it’s actually Jim that she sees when she takes the bus to London.
I read Carried Away in book Vintage Munro, and ended up buying “Open Secrets” because of it. It was my favourite short stories by the author as well. I’ll have to see your posts on the rest of the collection, perhaps this one is worth bumping up the TBR list.
It’s just great, isn’t it? There are at least two other stories in this collection that I think are outstanding as well (for me, anyway). I am also very fond of Runaway, but Open Secrets is definitely one of my favourites.
I have never read anything by Munro so would this be a good title to get me started?
With just a peek at your recent reading, I think you’d like this collection of hers rather well.
This is one of my favourite Munro stories too even though, after several readings through the years, I remain uncertain about some sections and what they mean. Perhaps the latter is a good thing in that it means I can interpret those sections appropriately to my age and life experience at the time of reading. I especially like the library setting and the “journey” the library books take in the story: the books play the role of a minor character. And the library itself? I’ve been in several small town libraries that would be perfect for this story.
It does leave a lot of room for interpretation, doesn’t it? Especially in the latter section, when Louisa is not clearly identifying people herself. I found myself picturing the Goderich library for this story, partly because Goderich features in some of the Friend of My Youth stories, but I don’t think they had lamps like that. Wonder whether anyone has compiled a list of books that are referred to in Alice Munro’s stories: this one would be crucial for such a project, although I’m not sure I’d want to add any of Jack’s or Arthur’s books to my TBR list!
Munro’s stories perplex me in how she weaves the lives of her characters and pulls me into their worlds of the frustrations and hopes of everyday life.