I am fond of specific Alice Munro collections: A Friend of My Youth because it was my first, Open Secrets because it was the impetus for a particularly good book club discussion some years ago, and Runaway.
Runaway because I have a memory of reading it in a cafe in Stratford the winter after it was published and, while I was seated at the table with a hot drink and a treat and my book, Alice Munro walked in.
I had just reached the point in the collection where one can’t help but marvel at the way that the stories are pleated together, and my reading life and my real life nestled together as well.
So I sat down to reread this collection with some eagerness, bolstered by nostalgia. But within a few pages, I remembered more. That this first story contained a tense and difficult scene with a woman who felt threatened by a man’s unexpected presence in a room with her and, also, a bloody death.
It has been ten years. But these experiences, too, were worth remembering apparently. Though only vague and murky impressions, these scenes lodged in my reader’s brain as solidly as the image of a woman in a black coat coming in from the winter to warm herself in a cafe in which I read for entire afternoons.
This story’s atmosphere is overwhelmingly weighty. From the opening sentence: “Carla heard the car coming before it topped the little rise in the road that around here they called a hill.”
Readers have many clues here. First, the perspective is Carla’s, so it is limited. (Later, of course, it is also Sylvia’s perspective, as the women’s stories intersect and the voices alternate.) And she is in a state of anticipation. She is straining to see what is coming next. Our narrator is openly stressed.
The world she inhabits normally is quiet and insular. From the barn, she can hear a car on the road some distance away, even without the visual cue of the car itself. And this world has its own language, one which lends an air of the grandiose to the mundane.
Or, perhaps, Carla is simply the kind of person for whom words are often disappointments. Perhaps this is a hint that she would prefer to inhabit a world with hills but, instead, there is only a small rise. And she, on top of all that, is on the other side of it, not even at the peak, though she can see it in the distance.
Carla’s understanding sprawls far beyond readers’ comprehension, for of course she can explain her anxiety, but the scene is clearly ominous. Even readers freshly arrived to the action/inaction can recognize the tension immediately.
Carla wants to see, seems nearly desperate to see, but is simultaneously concerned that she not be seen. Not only wanting to avoid being seen by the driver but also that she not be seen not wanting to be seen when she is straining to see by Clark, who is at home with her.
Yes, I’m making it complicated deliberately, but so is our storyteller. Even within a single perspective (be it Carla’s or Sylvia’s), there are many layers to the questions of motivation and these shift even within a single reading. But there is no possibility of misunderstanding for readers on one matter: this is a messy situation.
“It was almost a relief, though, to feel the single pain of missing Flora, of missing Flora perhaps forever, compared to the mess she had got into concerning Mrs. Jamieson, and her seesaw misery with Clark. At least Flora’s leaving was not on account of anything that she – Carla – had done wrong.”
Carla’s despair (and, furthermore, Sylvia’s grief, as readers come to understand) are reflected in the heavy rains the region has received. They have caused substantial damage and repairs are still underway. But something turns in “Runaway” and the tone shift is evident in the landscape as well.
“There was enough of a wind blowing to lift the roadside grass, the flowering weeds, out of their drenched clumps. Summer clouds, not rain clouds, were scudding across the sky. The whole country side was changing, shaking itself loose into the true brightness of a July day.”
But what of Carla’s “seesaw misery” with Clark? “She saw him as the architect of the life ahead of them, herself as captive, her submission both proper and exquisite.” At what point in her life is this perspective valid? Is she looking at her past self or her present self? How is her status both proper and exquisite? And how carefully must she breathe, in order to guard her own survival? Who is the title’s runaway, really?
“It was as if she had a murderous needle somewhere in her lungs, and by breathing carefully, she could avoid feeling it. But every once in a while she had to take a deep breath, and it was still there.”
This opening story forces readers to take an uncomfortably deep breath, feel the pain, and then navigate a series of shorter exhalations as the tension rises and falls in unexpected ways. As events unfold, a moment of great crisis dissipates into silence (and the reader must wait for another character’s perspective to gain some understanding of the gap) and a moment of would-should-could-have-been-resolution escalates the tension until readers are breathless.
In so many ways, I long for this story to be other than it is. Even as I admire it for its insistance upon the difficult.
If you know this story, how does it leave you feeling? And, if you do not, are there any other Munro collections in your stacks?
Note: This is part of a series of posts on Alice Munro’s stories in Runaway as I read through her work-to-date. She is one of my MRE authors and this is the first story in this collection. Please feel free to check the schedule and join in, for the series, or for a single story. Next week: “Change”.
Note: There are spoilers in the comments below.
I’m so happy that you’re posts are up again. I’ve “kept up” with the reading and now I’ll enjoy the blog-posts as they come.
I had to reread the ending to this story a few times because I couldn’t quite believe the “remnants” in the final scene. It’s just a bit too awful and it makes Clark quite a bit more tangibly scary. Up to this point we could attribute to Carla a false or exaggerated sense of Clark.
I kept wondering what happened to Flora after Sylvia and Clark saw her in the night. And I couldn’t wait for Sylvia to have a chance to complete the experience by sharing it with Carla to compare her own perspective with Clark’s. It would have completed some kind of circle, wouldn’t it have? But we don’t get spoon fed the “right” ending by this author.
I read this collection of stories very soon after it was published and I remember the title story, not by any of the details, but by the mood it created in me. It’s a kind of slow-boiling horror, very similar to the one created (for me) in the story called “Save the Reaper.”
Funny how certain stories just dig in, isn’t it. As soon as Clark appeared in the house, I was sure that I knew what happened (in my memory it was Sylvia who was killed, not Flora) but of course was just as unsettled (for having misremmbered) in the end.
And the layers of horror build too, because as soon as we accept the fact that he has slaughtered (sacrificed?) Flora, we realize that he was likely behind Flora’s initial disappearance. And this is as far (nearly) as we readers can go back, with the abuse, but we are left to think that we would be forced to reconcile other misunderstandings with what we thought we knew about this relationship and the reality of it, if we did, in fact, have more of a perspective on these characters’ lives.
Yes, a sigh is the appropriate response for sure. Except perhaps a reread? When Munro challenges me like this I want to reread even if it was challenging the first time. I want to double check and see if possibly I missed some wee thing that will shed more light on what I think I understood so far.
Rereading with Munro’s stories is always helpful. I always notice something new on another pass.
I found this story very disturbing. I felt that the ground was constantly shifting under me as I journeyed with these characters, particularly Clara and Sylvia, through a challenging period of their lives. I would be expecting something to happen and something very different would happen. Things would get better in one sense and much worse in another. What seemed should happen for one character actually happened for another. It was a rocky ride. I liked your way of putting it: “in so many ways, I long for this story to be other than it is.”
It feels uncomfortable almost all the way through, doesn’t it? With the exception perhaps of a brief period with the two women in Sylvia’s home, when it appears that Carla has made a decision that makes her feel hopeful, but there is even tension attached to that, to the idea of turning one’s back on the known and stretching beyond. That scene, when Sylvia is surprised in her home? That really stuck with me. And how ironic, because there is no outward violence. Unlike the remnants in the final scene. Sigh.