It’s a time of “political and intellectual crisis” in The Little Company. Sound familiar?
Drusilla Modjeska’s introduction situates readers in Dark’s depiction of ordinary life in Sydney and Katoomba, in this time of “recession, nuclear threat and more failed expectations” in Australia.
The Little Company is Dark’s seventh novel, and Modjeska succinctly explains the link between its characters’ political explorations and stances, particularly the married couple’s differing positions, and Eleanor’s and her husband’s evolving political views (left and left-leaning).
We come to understand how differently the two world wars were experienced in Australia (which is to say, active in both, but only directly threatened by invasion in the second).
And we witness and recognise Modjeska’s changing perspectives on Dark’s view of marriage, of the choices available to women (a sister, a wife, and daughters) in this story, from Modjeska’s reading of the novel at a younger age and a rereading undertaken in the 1980s to write this introduction, in a decade when talk of shattering glass ceilings took hold.
Eleanor Dark’s 1945 novel strikes me as relevant, surprisingly fresh. The idea of a “heavy, unhappy knowledge that in a disordered world you must, if you want truth, hunt for it, build it laboriously from a thousand tiny assembled scraps of data”. The “to and fro” and “the pull of unscrupulous propaganda”.
Most of all—the “issue which split the world in two, split nations, split parties, split friendships and families—do you believe in human beings, or don’t you?”
In combination with the complicated feelings looking back on a difficult year: “Where had it gone—this oppressive, menacing year, now almost ended?” In which there was some knitting, some lectures, some growing of “vegetables where once flowers grew” and dipping “into her purse for ‘worthy’ causes”. But, overall, “the conviction of a wasted year”.
But it’s the kind of time that makes a writer ask: “Why write?” And I particularly appreciated reading about Gilbert’s writing.
It’s been a few years since he’s published a book. And his wife, Phyllis, dedicated to “feigning a polite and admiring interest”, to express her “wifely duty”, is impatient. She has firm opinions: “Culture was right and proper.” But little interest.
And Gilbert’s endless reading “with an almost passionate concentration”, as though a student studying for exams, doesn’t cut it for her. “There was something solid abut a book with covers.” Her questions about his daily “work” become more pointed, and her tolerance ebbs.
Readers are drawn closer to Gilbert’s perspective. We feel his uncertainty keenly, his grappling with questions about how to and whether to shape narrative in times like these.
With how to start: “No matter where you begin, someone else has brought the story to that point; no matter where you end, someone takes over from you and carries it on.”
With the sense of inadequacy and futility twinned with necessity and compulsion: “All you can do is to record a fragment of human experience-anywhere, any time, for every moment gathers in the past and propels the future.”
A few scenes transport readers to the past, where we see Gilbert fall in love with notebooks and what he can do with them. (I can relate to this.) We witness his first purchase of a shiny-covered black notebook, for a week’s worth of pocket money, his “obscure creative urge to express himself”, how the “mere act of buying it was an assuagement of unrest” that “gave him a kind of affinity with Keats and Browning”.
There are so many great plot points in the novel, so many reasons to stick with the story (and as in any home-front war-time story, there are some significant losses).
Fiction about Writers
About Made-up Writers…
Mavis Gallant’s linked stories about Henri Grippes,
Abla Farhoud’s Hutchison Street (Trans. Judith Weisz Woodsworth),
Peter Unwin’s Searching for Petronius Totem,
Kate Taylor’s Serial Monogamy,
Blanche Howard’s The Ice Maiden,
Ann-Marie MacDonald’s Adult Onset,
Sam Savage’s The Cry of the Sloth,
About For-reals Writers…
Steven Price’s Lampedusa,
Anita Szado’s Studio Saint-Ex,
Richard B. Wright’s Mr. Shakespeare’s Bastards,
Writers’ Memoirs and Biographies…
Sheila Heti’s Motherhood,
Magie Dominic’s The Queen of Peace Room,
The Diaries of Dawn Powell,
Kim Echlin’s Elizabeth Smart: A Fugue on Women and Creativity,
Nicola Beauman’s The Other Elizabeth Taylor,
Sonny Liew’s The Art of Charlie Chan Hock Chye,
Noelle Boughton’s Margaret Laurence: A Gift of Grace, A Spiritual Biography,
Paule Marshall’s Triangular Road.
This writerly business is the least of it. So it doesn’t count as a spoiler to say that Gilbert does move out of this state of not-writing: “Writers live on their times: they have no material except the life around them.” Out of this concern: “For one-tenth of the world’s creative energy that has been effective, there’s probably been nine-tenths that was frustrated and lost.”
He emerges from this last year, which he inhabited “like a sleepwalker, awake only in his mind”.
He comes into another space, one with room for thoughts of a future:
“He felt an urgent, hungry desire to get on with his task of recording and interpreting even a trivial fragment of this enormous world-story, and he walked fast along the road towards the flat, like a man with a tryst to keep.”
Thanks to Bill for hosting Australian Women Writers Reading Week, Generation Three (Part Two) in 2020; I’ve had Eleanor Dark’s fiction on my shelves for a couple of decades, but at last I am grateful to have it, for company in these years characterized by crises.
[…] novels reviewed were Lantana Lane (by Emma of Book Around the Corner), The little company (by Buried in Print), and The timeless land (by […]
[…] Buried in PrintEleanor Dark, The Little Company (here) […]
Great post Buried, and I love the relevance to today – such as having to hunt for the truth amongst propaganda. It also sounds like Modjeska’s introduction is a wonderfully illuminating one.
This is another great contribution to Bill’s week, I must say.
Reading has offered so much comfort in recent years, illuminating just how historical a lot of these struggles and challenges are. I’ve found my way to Bill’s blog thanks to you and Lisa, so I’m reminded how fortunate we readers are, to have access to these stories and to a bookish community, even when we aren’t travelling more than a few blocks from home (although you all are, by now).
Thank you for reminding me of all the many wonderful Australian writers I have still to get to! I have The Timeless Land on my TBR shelves, but I know every little about Dark’s backlist. This sounds like a very timely read and I do love seeing the old green spine Viragos 🙂
I’m going to try to remember that your month of reading is next November too; I’ve been busy with MARM’s in past Novembers but maybe if I plan far enough ahead, I could do at least one. I’ve been wanting to reread Swords and Crowns and Rings for ages.
I wish I’d known about Australian Women week, as I can think of a few books on my shelves that I would have appreciated the spur to read. But no matter; one can’t do every challenge! Your inset box of further reading is awfully tempting. I have so many favourites I could add in. (Motherhood — memoir or autofiction?)
Now I wish I had tweeted about it. But of course you have a kajillion other books in your stack right now too–that one might have been the proverbial straw. (Technically I guess it is autofiction, but I feel like Heti was doing Heti before that term appeared in bookchatter? Speaking of her, are you enjoying How to Be?)
Less immediately satisfying than Motherhood, BUT last night I read a passage that slapped me upside the face, so it’s become unexpectedly relevant to me.
Now, of course I’m curious about that passage! There are also some short videos you can watch online (I think she refers to making them with/about Margot in the book?) which brought out a different angle for me.
It’s her therapist talking about the “Puer” — i.e. not growing up or making decisions. I’ll have to go find those after I finish reading.
Sometimes a book just lands in our lap, in the very moment we’re ready to read it.
Rebecca, I run an Australian Women Writers week every year about this time (2nd or 3rd week in January). Next year we’ll be looking at Gen 4 (roughly the 1960s, 70s, 80s). If you do post a Gen 3 (or earlier) review later in the year let me know at theaustralianlegend.wordpress.com and I’ll add it to the AWW Gen 3 page (see link above) and also will let readers know.
Oh, okay. I don’t have anything from the Gen3 time period; the ones I have are more recent: Jill Ker Conway (borderline Gen 4?), Kate Grenville.
Gosh, this seems so relevant right now, you are certainly right about that. This idea of pushing through the days, they may not be magical, but we must endure them despite everything going on around us. Finding joys in simple things again when we can’t be distracted by the busyness of life, etc. Mind you, I can’t even begin to imagine what it must feel like living under a threat of invasion, it strikes me as absolutely terrifying, almost paralyzing in a way.
It felt even more relevant too, because it wasn’t really so much of a real threat (i.e. there was no evidence that this was a real risk), it was simply that something that had never happened before, was no longer a thing that would never happen. Now, it might happen. It could happen. Which, I think, is exactly what a lot of Canadians have been thinking, lately, watching the relationship with the U.S. morph over the past four years (and of course those divisions still exist, despite the recent administration change). That what’s possible is suddenly bigger and scarier.
Oh this sounds good! No I have to go check and see if my library has it.
It’s a little eerie how many phrases I felt were so completely of this story and, yet, so immediately applicable to the U.S. today.
I’m not sure I’ve read anything about the Australian war experience and its aftermath, ficional or otherwise. This sounds like an interesting starting point. The writing angle would be a bonus!
England, France, Italy, Germany, Russia: wartime fiction does tend to repeat in these regions, doesn’t it, but surely there are many other perspectives we’ve overlooked, even if, as in this case, there was no direct conflict on their shores. There were so many writerly quotations that I wanted to share here. Gilbert really does get all in his head about his craft smiles and he eventually becomes more active in a local writing group, too. (But the book is mostly marriage, which I think you’d enjoy too.)
I’ve just read Lantana Lane and loved it. This one sounds good too.
Nice to see you here: thanks for stopping by. I definitely want to read more of Eleanor Dark!
Ten minutes ago, I read a review of another Eleanor Dark novel – Lantana Lane which I have tbr. I don’t have The Little Company, but will look out for it. It seems to portray the kind of themes I enjoy reading about.
I’ve heard good things about Lantana Lane, but I chose this one for January because Bill had been discussing women writers in relationship to wartime; from what I recall, Lantana Lane sounded more appealing initially, wartime aside.
Eleanor Dark is a name I’ve been vaguely aware of for a while, and have intended to track down on occasion. I may even have a Virago somewhere – I shall have to check. You have me intrigued…
The criticism/censure that she and her husband experienced IRL (he, in particular, in regards to his medical practice) for their left-leaning political views would interest you, I think, although that’s just simmering beneath the surface of this story. (Some people judged them harshly without an understanding of the different stances on the spectrum of left-leaning ideas, but perhaps they wouldn’t have been accepted even if they had been more properly understood.)
[…] Read on … […]
Many of the women writers of this period were or started out as school teachers. In fact it’s rarely remarked on but this was probably the first generation of middle class women who needed to work before they were married. I’m not sure of Dark’s educational background but she was a doctor’s wife and so had more freedom (from financial pressures) to write than most of her fellows. I wonder if she is here suggesting that she felt some pressure when she wasn’t actually pumping out books.
Dark is famous for her Timeless Land trilogy which imagines the Aboriginal reaction to white settlement (233 years ago on 26 Jan) and I have tended to disregard her studies of ordinary middle class life, which has been my loss I think now.
Or, at the very least, that she felt that others were judging her (or, not supporting her, outwardly, anyway) if she wasn’t producing. I wonder, too, if left-leaning women writers faced this more often, too, because some (like Winifred Holtby, in England, for instance) did a lot of journalistic writing and pamphlets and lectures/speeches, but, in the end, that wasn’t perhaps viewed as “real” writing, the kind you find between two covers.
I’ve got an old copy of The Timeless Land that’s about 500 pages long with fine print; I wonder if that’s just one of the volumes, of if they’ve been combined. Will have to investigate!