Whitney Otto’s How to Make an American Quilt was a story which immediately and powerfully appealed to me.
As a narrative it was deliberately fragmented (like a quilt), and the idea of a mosaic of smaller pieces comprising a larger, complex whole translated brilliantly into film in the hands of Jocelyn Moorhouse.
I know, I know: a lot of people disliked the film, and not only because they disliked Winona Ryder as Finn, but because the story was structured in such a way that readers and viewers must be patient.
They were required to put a fair bit of work into drawing the connections themselves, and this idea of a mosaic of women (of artists, of friends, of lovers) plays out similarly in Eight Girls Taking Pictures.
This new novel is arranged into eight parts, each prefaced with a single photograph and titled for the woman who shot it, whose story will follow.
The work begins with Cymbeline, named for a king, which immediately draws attention to a series of gender-related issues, a focus which is echoed throughout this piece and throughout the work.
Cymbeline is striking out. She is not the first female photographer, but she is an oddity in the art world early in the twentieth century: surrounded by men, taught by men, sometimes restrained by and sometimes inspired by men.
And, yet, she experiences the art world very differently than the men in her classes, and this distinction continues to play out for her as the years pass, as she works to reconcile her identity as an artist with her identity as a wife and mother.
Cymbeline “had a moment of hard clarity that her life, her woman’s life, would be full of choices – ordinary ones a man might not even see as choices but as ‘life’ – that would constantly be canceling each other out”.
This kind of realization is echoed in later segments, although the women’s experiences vary widely and more opportunities are available to later characters.
“’It’s like I’ve had this great adventure, as if I’ve found my truest self,’ she said. ‘I’m not really fit for a woman’s life.'”
The narrative moves through time, slowly at first, with several of the early segments overlapping, the effects of the Great War impacting each of them in different ways.
Events like this in the novel are clearly of historical importance and each woman is touched by them, but they are also described with the novel’s theme in mind, often alluding to the intersection between reality/experience and perception/memory.
“Those who made it home weren’t the same, and those who waited at home were also changed. Everyone became a stranger of the most dislocating sort because everyone became, once again, unknown. Unknown yet looking familiar, everyone resembling someone he or she used to know.”
As the narrative progresses, the women’s lives begin to tangibly intersect, which adds another layer of interest to the story (just as the pieces of the quilt were connected to ever-larger segments in Otto’s earlier novel).
“And here is the funny thing about artistic influences: They don’t always come from the person whose work you think you love best. For example, Jessie very much liked Cymbeline’s pictures, but they weren’t her overall favorites. The importance of Cymbeline, for Jessie, was that she was the one who made photography possible for Jessie, both in her own mind and in the external world.”
And throughout, there is this echo of choices made (and avoided) and the different way that women experience this question of “choice” given the other passions and loves in their lives.
“She didn’t hate being a wife any more than she hated being a mother. What she hated was the way that wife, mother, and photographer created an unsolvable equation. What she hated was trying to solve the mathematics of her various roles. Factoring in her love and artistic connection to Ines was nearly impossible. Factor in fame and success, and she was no longer certain about anything.”
Also considered is the idea that these choices change the way that women identify inspiration for creative work.
“There was no mistaking that Miri Marxi’s serial portrait of her New York City neighborhood was as much a portrait of Miri as a wife and mother as Cymbeline’s garden pictures were of her life as a wife and mother. Cymbeline thought, We abstract the experience and the mean only see what we do as sweet, sentimental, missing the meaning entirely.”
For anyone who is interested in the ways in which women strive to balance creative work and the demands of personal relationships (whether with partners or children, or otherwise) and other domestic responsibilities, Eight Girls Taking Pictures, the idea of this novel will inherently appeal.
And, yet, as much as I love the idea of it, the realization of it does not fit with my expectations of a novel that I love. For my reader’s taste, Whitney Otto’s language is too functional, the expression unyielding, and it restricts the imaginative spirit that I long for in such a story. It is a wonderful concept, and I love to look at the imagery associated with it (see the Huffington Post feature here), but her writing style and my reading style are not a perfect match.
Sandra – I was working in a bookstore with HtMaAQ was published in hard cover, and I remember it got strong reviews, so maybe others don’t feel the same way about the book-movie relationship there, but I definitely felt the connection was stronger for me with the film than the text, and I agree, that is rare. It really stands out when that happens.
WG – It’s actually her fifth novel. Her website lists them, so you can see what you’ve missed. I’ve also read The Passion Dream Book, but not the others.
Danielle – Please don’t let my response deter you; it’s just not a fit for me with the style, and it obviously works for lots of other readers. And, anyhow, the idea of it and the women’s lives are fascinating.
Claire – I’d have to check my log, but I think I might have tried the book after I’d read the film, so that might have had something to do with it too. It was so long ago, and I’m not sure my Book-First rule was hard and fast then. Nonetheless, I can still recall specific scenes from the film that have stuck with me: I think it’s time for a re-view. I know you love photography: does the idea of this novel still appeal, despite your lacklustre response to her other novels?
Re: American Quilt, I liked the film a lot and didn’t care for the book at all. There were dialogues in the movie that I felt essential to the story and was disappointed to find they were not in the book. I tried to give Otto another try with another of her novels (forgot the title now, the one before that with Beauties in the title). It was nice but didn’t do much for me. It was exactly as in your last paragraph above. She had “wonderful concepts” (in both books that I read) but.. “language too functional, expression unyielding, and restricting the imaginative spirit”.. you couldn’t have said it any better. We weren’t a perfect match either.
I’m so behind. May have to rethink my reading pile from the library. I’m only just going to pick this one up tomorrow. The book I had been reading am feeling sort of lackluster about so had pinned my hopes for a good story on the Otto–I’ll give it a whirl and see how it works for me. I’ve never read any of Whitney Otto’s books or seen the movie from How to Make an American Quilt–I do have that book sitting on my desk at work, though… Maybe I’ll opt for a mystery I’ve got checked out instead for something totally different.
Is this her second novel? I wondered what happened to her. I enjoyed her first novel and the film as I recollect but that was a long time ago.
I loved the movie version of How to Make an American Quilt and still watch it occasionally. I have never read the book. Perhaps this has the potential for another movie and maybe that is Otto’s strength? Wonder if these novels are those rare things,-books that come completely alive when presented on the screen? Much would depend upon the casting of course. The theme of women balancing creative work and personal relationships certainly appeals strongly to me as does the historical context. I am also caught by the idea of “choices” women make and some of these not being seen by men as choices but rather just as life. Thanks for your insights.