Immediately I like Corrie. When Howard Ritchie comes to dinner, he has some reservations about her. But I liked her.
“She seemed both bold and childish. At first, a man might be intrigued by her, but then her forwardness, her self-satisfaction, if that was what it was, would become tiresome.”
Was it self-satisfaction? Or perhaps something else? Perhaps confidence, or more simply, intelligence and wit.
Perhaps Howard’s observations have more to do with his own expectations than with Corrie’s outward self.
“In spite of her quick tongue, he expected her to have a conventional mind.”
Well, that’s Howard. And perhaps he is simply preoccupied with drawing a contrast between his unconventional, left-wing wife and Corrie. (For, yes, Howard is married.)
But Corrie’s quick tongue led me to expect the unconventional. (I have a penchant for quick-tongued heroines.)
Despite her limp, she takes Howard out to see the grounds after dinner, out to the river bank and sits on the grass to admire the sunset, talks of her upcoming trip to Egypt.
Despite his initial reservations, Howard responds to Corrie in ways he had not anticipated.
He is a married man, but he answers one of her postcards from Egypt.
And, then, there is this: “He hadn’t been sure how he would react to the foot in bed. But in some way it seemed more appealing, more unique, than the rest of her.”
I had to re-read that passage (even though this is actually one of the stories that was included in “The New Yorker” that I read before it was published in Dear Life), for although I had remembered the relationship taking this turn, I hadn’t remembered the explanation being so bold, so forward. (So, um, self-satisfied?)
There is a degree of satisfaction in the telling of this bit, about the questions of Corrie’s virginity (how she was both more and less innocent than Howard might have expected and Howard’s supply of condoms (how he was both more and less calculating than Corrie might have expected).
Furthermore, there is a degree of satisfaction about the effective concealment of their continued relationship.
“The fact being that the people they might have met, and never did, would not have suspected them of being the sinful pair they still were.”
Corrie’s experience of a relationship rooted in infidelity is different from some other women in Alice Munro’s stories.
For instance, when Rose (a married woman) acts on her desire for a married man, the results are not what she was hoping for.
“She could not hear any of this music for a long time without a specific attack of shame, that was like a whole wall crumbling in on her, rubble choking her.” (“Mischief”, Who Do You Think You Are?)
When Frances, an unmarried music teacher, considers her relationship with the (married) science teacher, it is with a “familiar pressure”. (“Accident”, The Moons of Jupiter)
“There was a peculiar code, a different feeling, for each time. The time in the science room like lightning and wet paint. The time in the car in the rain in the middle of the afternoon, with sleepy rhythms, so pleased and sleepy they were then that it seemed they could hardly be bothered to do the next thing. That time had a curved, smooth feeling for her, in memory, the curve came from the sheets of rainwater on the windshield, looking like looped-back curtains.”
And when the narrator of “The Spanish Lady” tries to decipher the truth about the relationship that existed between her own husband and her friend, Margaret, she is preoccupied as much by the reality of her marriage and its unhappiness as by the possibility of infidelity as a contributing factor to her sorrow.
“The unhappiest moment I could never tell you. All our fights blend into each other and are in fact re-enactments of the same fight, in which we punish each other — I with words, Hugh with silence — for being each other. We never needed any more than that.” (Something I’ve Been Meaning to Tell You)
Infidelities are scattered throughout Alice Munro’s stories, populated by married and unmarried women and married and unmarried men (and, occasionally, children on the margins, as in “To Reach Japan” in this collection).
And where does Corrie fit in? What is the wall that crumbles in on her? Does she have memories with a curved, smooth feeling? What is her unhappiest moment?
“Corrie” contains the answers to all of these questions, although each reader will undoubtedly interpret them differently; “Corrie” leaves room for the unconventional reader.
Warning: There will likely be spoilers in the discussion of this story below.
Note: This is part of a series of posts on Alice Munro’s stories, as I read through her work-to-date. She is one of my MRE authors and, until now, this has been a chronological reading project, but I was unable to resist inserting her most recent collection. Please feel free to check the schedule and join in, for the series, or for a single story. This story is the seventh in Dear Life, with next Sunday reserved for “Train” and the following Wednesday for “In Sight of the Lake”. Wednesdays and Sundays for Alice Munro, for March and April 2013.
[…] about Corrie Spears, but even more about the main characters in the novel, from her perspective. (The name Corrie immediately recalls the Alice Munro story named for its heroine of that name, and there is something about her matter-of-fact maner and forthright spirit which seems to fit […]
Thanks so much for the comments. Alice Munro requires
a lot of thought and it’s great to get other people’s
impressions of her work.
Betty
I am reading dear life and would appreciate
Receiving entries about the rest of the stories
in the book.
Thanks
Betty
Thanks, Betty. There are links to the other stories here. Enjoy!
I liked Corrie too. On looking back I am wondering if Munro was giving us a major hint about Howard when she tells us that Howard thought Corrie looked like a “girl who spent a lot of time playing golf and tennis.” It is not for another whole page that she informs us that Corrie has a limp and sort of covers for Howard by saying he hadn’t been sure of that before. Because everything she does is usually very deliberate I wondered why she did this? Perhaps just to see if I was paying attention (smile). Munro also gives Corrie some great lines such as those referring to Tommy Douglas: “Daddy loves him. Daddy’s a Communist.” I especially liked that Corrie bought an old library and played at being librarian. I also liked how Munro wrote this relationship and leaves us wondering and wanting just a little more information.
Oh, the library thing was great, wasn’t it?! What’s the other great Munro story that’s all about the librarian…can’t think of it now! But I think you’re right, in suggesting that that observation is more important than we might think on first reading. Of course it makes sense that Munro’s male characters would be just as aware as her female characters of the multitude of class issues — the view of the golf-playing and tennis-playing group from the perspective of the non-golf-playing and non-tennis-playing characters — but I wasn’t all-that-attentive to that when I was caught up in Corrie’s story for the first time. (Although I did giggle at the TD line! Communist, heheh.)
I also think that I would get along with Corrie, and for some reason, I find the male protagonist of this story a little sleazy. Especially after that comment about the foot. I am so looking forward to reading this book, and being able to discuss with you. Should I start from the very beginning, or just start where you are at now? Let me know what you think.
LOL Okay, now I’m hoping you DO start with this story, because I want to know if you still think he’s a little sleezy AFTER you’ve read “Corrie”! Seriously though, I don’t think it would matter in this case, if you started in the middle, because the works were originally published in a variety of other places, so I don’t think it’s like reading a more tightly curated collection, in which the order might matter. The final four stories are, apparently, related, but I think there are still three stories after “Corrie” and before those linked tales.