It began when I was a girl, with books like Jean Webster’s Daddy Long Legs and Norma Fox Mazer’s I, Trissy.
These stories invited me directly into characters’ private thoughts, via letters written to a trusted recipient and journal entries written for the writer’s own eyes.
When I was in university, I thrilled to the letters in de Laclos’ Les Liasons Dangereuses.
(Not because I was seduced by French letters in translation, but because I had loved the 1988 film with John Malkovich, Glenn Close and Michelle Pfeiffer.)
And, a few years later, I was tickled by the e-mails in Bridget Jones’ Diary.
If I had discovered a book like Daniel Glattauer’s Love Virtually then, I would have gobbled it whole.
Not only as a book of letters, which is intimate enough, but a book of love letters: as intimate as it gets.
And, yet, Love Virtually is not immediately inviting.
That suits the story, as its main characters are not immediately drawn to one another.
In fact, their meeting is accidental, for Leo has received an email that Emmi sent in order to cancel a magazine subscription.
The first emails they exchange are short and uncomplicated but, almost immediately (about 10 pages into the novel), it’s clear that this correspondence has taken on an unexpected importance for Leo and Emmi.
Subject: Something’s missing
Dear Leo,
If you don’t write to me for three days 1) I begin to wonder why, 2) I feel like something’s missing. Neither is pleasant.
Please rectify!
Emmi
And some weeks later, some 20 pages later, the letters are that much more complicated.
Subject: Test
Dear Emmi,
I’m finding it had to resist your hot-and-cold emails. Who’s actually paying us for the time we’re whiling away here together (or not together)? And how can you fit it in with your career and your family?
[…]
Have a nice afternoon,
Leo
Some of the content and trajectory of the story is predictable; even from these brief excerpts, one might surmise that readers will brush against questions of fidelity, devotion, romance and marriage as they continue to read through Leo and Emmi’s correspondence.
Nonetheless, Daniel Glattauer’s novel manages to take a flat medium and make the story compelling, even pull marginal characters (like Emmi’s husband, for instance) off the novel’s page.
(These characters should be even flatter than paper, for unlike the love letters in Chordelos de Laclos’ Les Liasons Dangereuses there is no ink, no parchment, no shape at all to these characters which exist only in the ether.)
Were I not fond of the epistolary form to begin with, I might have struggled to find the charm in this novel, but given that I love reading other people’s mail, I was quite content to read along (and more than a little curious about what will happen next in Leo’s and Emmi’s virtual world).
This is my first read for Melwyk’s Postal Reading Challenge.
I’m planning to alternate one book of fictional epistles with one book of “real” letters, and I’ve got four non-fiction choices tempting me right now for the next installment in the challenge.
Have you been reading (or writing?!) any letters recently?
I don’t quite diligently follow the format of contemporary epistolary novels (that is: formatted as email correspondence). I mean, I have to pay attention to the timestamp and the subject and then I have to compare that with the timestamp of the other person. I’m too impatient, and so I skipped those when I read the Glattauer, which I loved anyway. When there’s an in-text reference to what I skipped, I just backpedaled and took a look-see, haha.
But I do love Les Liasons Dangereuses — it was so very lush and meaty, and aside from the language and the scandalousness and all the seduction thrown willy-nilly, it made me wistful for lengthy letters as norm.
What I thought was interesting about the timestamps in this novel? There were no dates and times (I get caught up on those too), just relative descriptions (e.g. Three days later). That worked well, I thought, skipping past the details and, at the same time, emphasizing that when the intimacy in a relationship is swelling, each day that passes between contact is note-worthy. There is an early Canadian epistolary novel that made me think of LLD; The History of Emily Montague by Frances Brooke. There are a lot of descriptions of the landscape and society, and the relationships are not as steamy or scandalous, but the romance is pervasive, and I enjoyed the old-fashioned feel of it.
This sounds like a unique story — hard to make emails work as intimately as paper letters, I often feel, so am glad to hear that this one succeeded! The only other email novel I can think of immediately is Diane Schoemperlen’s At a Loss for Words, have you read that one?
ps – don’t forget you can link your reviews up at http://indextrious.blogspot.ca/2013/01/postal-reading-challenge-april-june.html
Yes! I wondered if someone would mention that one. She’s one of my MRE authors and although that one wasn’t one of my favourites, I did think of it many times while reading this one, and thought there were parts of AAL4W that I rather wished had been incorporated into LV (I don’t want to say more and risk spoilers, but it hinged on the idea that her book is written from only one side of the relationship and I felt that added an interesting layer to the story). (Thanks: I’d forgotten to do that!)
I love epistolary novels, 84 Charing Cross Road being my favourite:-) I’ve read many books of letters over the years.
One I read this year and adored is the letters of Robert Browning and Elizabeth Barrett Browning. I think I’ll check this one out, love, correspondence in the modern and virtual era, sounds like a blogger’s cup of tea:-)
That might be my favourite to, BB. The Browning letters would be wonderful; I have a collection of Flaubert and Sand which I imagine would be similar in some ways, and I really should dust it off, as I once “needed” it so desperately that I ordered it overseas, and, then, it languished with the biographies. Sigh.
I love epistolary novels – and have wondered how one based strictly on email would fare. I think this will find its way to my TBR list 😉
I just saw one in the library the other day, while browsing, that is all Twitter conversations. *clears throat* If one can use conversation in that context. *bites lip* At first I thought it would be frustrating, but now I wish I’d snapped it up!
This book won me over despite my reservations about it. Thinking back I still feel those reservations, but I also really enjoyed it somehow? Do you think you might read “Every Seventh Wave”? I thought it was stronger in many aspects, even though at the same time “Love Virtually” works better as a stand-alone novel?
While I was reading it, I thought that I wouldn’t likely read the sequel, but I changed my mind in the last 20 pages; I’m even more curious now that you’ve said you think it’s stronger in some ways. But, at the same time, I have so many others in mind for this challenge that have been on my TBR for ages, so I feel a bit of a twinge when I think about snapping this sequel up while they all wait (im)patiently. *hops from one foot to t’other*
I love epistolary novels too and also reading collections of real letters. The Bloomsbury Group were prolific letter writers and many of them have had their correspondence collected. As for ‘Les Liasons Dangereuses’ I saw that when it was first dramatised at the RSC in Stratford and the film never quite lived up to that live performance but the book is wonderful.
Do you have any favourites amongst the Bloomsbury gang? I went through a phase of reading Virginia Woolf’s diaries some years ago, but I don’t think I ever got into her letters (or any of the others), but they would be good choices for this challenge. I’d’ve loved to have seen LLD live: lucky you!
I also love epistolary novels, and would be charmed by this one, I am sure! I love that their email correspondence begins with a cancelled magazine subscription, and would love to see where this one goes. It seems odd that a relationship should start this way, but there are weirder things, that’s for sure.
I don’t often write letters, but I do write thank you cards. I need to see if there is anyone out there to correspond with! After all, Lord knows I have the stationary!
It’s true…sometimes friendships start out in the strangest ways. There must be a formula which can determine the likelihood, based on the number of books in their collection perhaps, that a book-lover has a similarly extravagant collection of note-paper and cards, doncha think?
Oh yes, the stationery … I have lots of that too … I made anew year’s resolution a couple of years back to write more thankyou letters rather than do nothing or send an email. That helps with the stationery, and people really like it don’t they.
I too loved Daddy Long Legs in my youth …and it was made into a film with Fred Astair I think …. Saw it in the midday movies in my student days!
I actually do write letters …. Every week since 1994 I write to a friend in California and she writes to me. We email occasionally, we communicate via Facebook occasionally, but we both love to write and receive proper letters. There’s something special about them … You tend to put more effort into a letter than and email I find.
Do you happen to know the collection of letters between Dale and Lynne Spender? Not many people do, because it was a small press publication, but I thought you might, being from Down Under, especially with your interest in “real” letters…it’s one of my favourites…and just thinking of it now makes me want to re-read it.
Ah no, I don’t, though I have heard of the Spenders … But you’re right, I probably would like them. I have, with my Jane Austen group been reading Austen’s letters in sections. We’ve nearly finished. They have been a joy …
It’s called Scribbling Sisters, and not only includes bookish bits but it encapsulates the times (Falklands War) in a way which is really interesting, years later. I got hooked on Dale Spender at a younger age, with her Women of Ideas, and I compulsively collected anything that I could find.
I’ll keep it in mind … Sisters writing is like Jane and her sister!