How anxious I was, about rereading this story; I had confused it with “In the Fall”, a heart-breaking story about Scott, a horse (you know the rule about spoilers and animal stories, eh?) who was once all black but became grey around the eyes by the time that story opened.
Now I can see why I muddled this story with it, but not because there’s a horse or any other animal (just the two-legged kind). Because there are echoes of the first two stories in the collection (“The Boat” and “The Vastness of the Dark”) with “The Golden Gift of Grey”.
Jesse here is eighteen, like James in “Vastness” and he, too, is reaching out beyond the familiar borders of his experience, not leaving familiar territory behind by hitchhiking, but exploring corners of the landscape that have been left in darkness until now.
And readers have an intimate view of this new narrator, Jesse, and his family life as he recreates a scene for us, chronicling everyday life, and particularly his father in an unawares moment—a scene not entirely unlike the father’s surroundings and way of being in “The Boat” on the fringes of family life.
“And his father who had been propped in front of the television in his undershirt, and in his sock feet and with the waistband of his trousers undone, and with his greying reddish head flopping occasionally from side to side as he dozed and slept more than he dared admit, would have risen and gone to lock the door for the night.”
Jesse’s father and mother “looked upon ‘studyen’ and whatever it might entail with a deep respect not far removed from fear”, while Jesse feels “a strange sensation and kinship with those boys in the F. Scott Fitzgerald stories who practise and practise but never play until a certain moment comes along in their lives and changes them forever”. (This reminds me of the father in “The Boat” and the son in “The Vastness of the Dark”.)
And while Jesse’s parents still journey back home, from Cincinnati to Covington, to the hills in Kentucky, they always return but they “would not wash the red hill mud from that car” and would wait “for the rains to do so as it stood out in the yard”. Their connection to those hills is strong, but strange to their children, and perhaps most especially to Jesse, for whom “studyen” comes naturally, whereas his folks struggle to sign his report cards.
They are playing a high stakes game; his father supports the family by working in an illegal mine, where he and his friend narrowly escaped a recent cave-in. The father’s speedy escape was either due to God’s grace (they’re leaning that way) or to his father’s wisdom and intuition in high-tailing it after the trail of rats heading for the surface even while the rumble was out of earshot.
Jesse, however, has just discovered the pool hall and is fascinated by the patrons there, by the place itself and also by how different it is from other places he has known. In one sense, it’s a coming-of-age story about a young man’s first glimpse of fresh possibilities; in another sense, it’s a story about how each of us navigates the terrain of difficult choices, how we manage our personal conviction and moral code with our understanding of how the world beyond us is swaying in that balancing act.
The Underneath
Two mechanical elements of “The Golden Gift of Grey” strike me as remarkable: the way the theme of the stories buoys readers throughout until the closing words create a boat beneath us, and the use of language that more fully immerses us in Jesse’s past and present.
We have this passage, for instance, later in the story—one of Jesse’s memories: “He thought then of the awful violence that was within his father; a something that rumbled deep below like some subterranean mountain stream of roaring white water, splashing and pounding dark rocks within deep unseen caves.”
These are not uncommon words (except for ‘subterranean’ perhaps, but the underneath really does matter in this collection and in this story particularly), but the structure of this sentence presents one simple statement about Jesse’s father on one side of the semi-colon and then two highly functioning phrases.
The phrases offer useful information but also issue a rush of syllables (including a lot of ‘r’ sounds in the first phrase and a lot of ‘s’ sounds in the second). If all of the paragraphs (or, even more of the paragraphs) in this story contained this much activity and sound, the story would feel oppressive. But the dominant clarity affords an opportunity to showcase a phrase like this. So we can feel the splashingandthe poundingandthe darkrocksandthe deepunseencaves.
Which is not to say that there must be a concatenation of consonants and a string of phrases to make draw readers more fully into a scene. Here’s another instance in which MacLeod invites us to feel between the words, while he is describing the scene of the pool hall. You can smell it—he describes the layers so vividly in an extended paragraph, that readers can’t help but smell it—and it’s not just a scent or a smell, but an odour.
“Over everything and all of them the odour hung and covered and pressed like the roof of a gigantic invisible tent from which there could be no escape.”
It “hung and covered and pressed”. Any one of those would have hinted at the scene. The trail of them allows each word to pile atop the previous word, until together they form that “invisible tent” and readers have “no escape”.
The details build the scene, but the vocabulary and word order and the phrasal construction immerse readers in that scene. And it’s not entirely comfortable, in either instance, which is just as intended.
Because Jesse is simultaneously thrilled to be in these new surroundings and unsettled by his being there. Not that this is his first visit to the pool hall; it’s just the first one that matters. He’s been in attendance long enough to suss out how it has become a place as familiar to the other men (and a few women, earning a few bucks via a ‘business’ that Jesse did not know existed) as Jesse’s home has been to him. But this night of the story is different.
Talking too much about that difference would spoil the story, but here readers are introduced to the setting:
“There were three quarters on the wood indicating that three challengers still remained. And he looked then at the soft, velvet green of the table itself, that held him, he thought, like a lotus land, and finally to the blackness of the eight-ball and the whiteness of the cue, good and evil he thought, paradoxically flowering here on the greenness of this plain.”
The language in the opening paragraphs spirals around sin and redemption: “forever lost”, “desperate hope”, “condemn”, “righteousness”, “awakening”, “saved”, “doomed”, and “underworld”. So, this description of the pool table with the contrast of eight-ball and cue paralleled to “good” and “evil” is fitting.
How Jesse experiences the events of this evening, and the morning that follows, is viewed within this prism, in a landscape of black and white—but also green. And it’s the “greenness of this plain” which introduces a third colour, something that Jesse struggles to place on the palette.
But the title talks of ‘green’ and not ‘grey’ and that’s because how the story ends is not as you might have guessed. MacLeod even seems to phrase the resolution is such a way that readers can slip past a single noun, one which clarifies a transaction that we might have viewed another way, if we so chose.
Over approximately two years, I am rereading Alistair MacLeod’s short stories, from start to stop, with time between, just as I’ve done with Alice Munro’s and Mavis Gallant’s short stories previously. If you love short stories or if you would like to be a short-story lover, several of these authors’ stories are among my favourites, and would make an excellent introduction to the finest of the form. If you have other favourite story writers, please feel free to contribute those to the conversation too.
Ah, don’t talk to me about Scott! I was only just beginning to get over that one 🙁
I promised to warn Mel about that one when it rolls around. (If I’d known you were going to read the collection, I would have warned you too!) But I also “owe” him for that super sad dog story he “recommended” to me! 🙁
I didn’t really realize how similar this story was to the others until I read this. The fathers are always so well described. And not in any kind of flattering way.
It’s interesting that James, at the same age as Jesse, left home and Jesse sends the whole house into a tizzy for being out all night. But I suppose it’s a matter of expectation. Jesse had never done that before. I was also struck by how the parents showed their worry, and that the feeling of fear of what the father might do seemed to override the worry.
I was happy about the way it ended. You?
Maybe I was poised to seek out similarities where, in fact, there are many differences if one were to take that approach. The fathers in the first two stories struck me as more benevolent.
You’ve singled out the fathers: do you feel like the descriptions of the mothers are lacking somehow, or they just don’t strike you the same way?
Well…then again, we’re not there for the evening after James has left…we’re with him on the road instead of back at home…so maybe there was nothing left to bake and everyone just crumbled into their glasses of scotch. 😀
I loved the ending. It might have been my favourite part. Largely because I wasn’t expecting it.
I definitely feel like the fathers have been more of a focus than the mothers. Also, all the protagonists so far have been boys. So, maybe, it being a few decades ago, the boys are more focused on their fathers and their fathers’ jobs? Now that I think of it, I’m more used to reading about women and mothers. Sometimes the fathers aren’t even in the picture. MacLeod does include very insightful bits about the mothers, just not as much.
Did you ever read Richard Wright’s Clara Callan? I remember thinking, at the time of publication (2001), how remarkable it was for a male author to inhabit the female mind and heart; so, I suppose, when MacLeod was writing, it would have been less likely for him to think of centring the mothers and sisters and daughters, especially when aiming to publish. Maybe even focussing on his characters’ emotional experiences was viewed as somewhat unusual then? While the female characters aren’t at the heart of these stories, I don’t feel as though he sees them as marginal in the family life, only in the context of the story.
I loved Clara Callan!
I agree – the women are not the focus, but I feel their strong presence in the men’s lives. And he seems to know a lot about what they might be feeling/thinking – like the mother who didn’t want to further alarm her husband by showing how worried she was (which puts a lot of emotional weight on her) and the mother who always knows when her kids are really sleeping or just pretending. I love those details.
I found it hard not to find this story almost crushing in the environment it depicts. Everywhere violence even death lurks, in the mines, the father’s temper, the many children in the family. The addition of the middle aged go go dancers was a master touch showing lives with no joy.
It’s true that there seems to be a weight to the entire story. I wonder, though, how much of that comes from the details (he does describe the drinkers and the dancers vividly, extraordinarily so) and how much is from the boy’s youth. For instance, maybe it all looks so much older and sadder because his own perspective is so youthful? Or, maybe it’s the opposite, that he sees the weight of it more clearly, because he knows now that nothing is black-and-white and this is what happens when one embraces that complexity?
I find in my own writing – and all I write is what you see in my blog – that to get a rush of words or syllables that works is rare and that the difficult thing is to make it fit in with the more prosaic prose around it. Despite your work here, I find I am still not concentrating on the underneath as I read, not with Such is Life over which I am spending so much time nor with books like Butter Honey Pig Bread say which I consume as audiobooks and so have no chance to re-view.
So maybe it’s a good thing that it’s rare, so you can avoid feeling like you’ve got to polish up the surroundings to keep the whole scene in synch? Heheh 🙂
Some books seem to prioritize story over craft, and others craft over story; some play with a balance between the two that seems obvious, others arrange that balance so that the story is strong enough to eclipse the craft but it’s there if you’re craving it. When the emphasis sways hard towards story, I’m not sure there is much of an underneath to mull over, in terms of the elements I’ve pulled out here (such care taken to select the words, arrange the words, etc.) so I think it makes sense that you’re not finding it in all of your reading. Is the reader of Butter Honey appealing for you as a listener? And, do you want cake?
The great majority of writers, it seems to me, are more or less competent at their craft and use it to tell interesting (or otherwise) stories. The stories I prefer involve lots of character development and very little happening, so I will tolerate detective fiction for instance if the protagonists and their interactions are interesting, but not otherwise.
But, writers and ‘craft’ are just the same as painters and pretty pictures. My preference is for Literature as Art. Writers who think about what they’re doing and who take writing in new directions. From that point of view I would like a novel to be all ‘underneath’. The Naked Lunch for instance. Or a more recent example, Solar Bones by Mike McCormack.
Butter Honey Pig Bread is read well, but mostly in straight Canadian (I presume) English. I have found other Nigerian fiction to be more ‘poetic’ but I wonder now if that was because their reader had an African accent.
Leaving aside pig, I found a lot of Ekwuyasi’s cooking appealing, but I’m too old for cake (ok, too fat).
Which is why we both enjoy Peter Temple’s mysteries, although you’ve read a bunch and I’ve read only one. If I had to choose, I would prioritize character too, and the bulk of my reading indulges that preference…but it also makes me keenly appreciate writers like Emily St. John Mandel, who quickly entwine me, make me care about someone, and then make things happen and make me want to turn the pages faster too.
What would you view as the/an alternative to Literature as Art? Is art always edifying, if it takes you in new directions? Does a experimental style or voice feel like you’re reading from underneath, or does that kind of thing leave you feeling lost? Do you think maybe this is too much to discuss in a comment section? LOL
I wondered about that, because the character has returned to Nigeria and much of the story is set there (via memory, too), but obviously not everyone from Nigeria has the same accent.
If one doesn’t eat a lot of cake (I don’t either, but I do have a sweet tooth) I think cake descriptions are even more important. And not just low-cal but no-cal (not that I believe in counting calories as part of die+t culture). Mostly I just loved how important food, the sharing of it, was depicted in family life. Nah, that’s not true. It was really the cake.
Definitely not about a horse! 😉
It’s not! LOL And even though it did inspire me to leaf through and locate that story, I think that I’ve forgotten the title again. bites nails