There’s so much chatter in Blogland about which is more helpful: a positive or negative review.
I wondered whether this was one of those questions that I might answer differently on any given day. Like “Favourite Author” or “Favourite Book”.
Such a response is so mood-dependent. Ask me today — it’s grey, it’s cool, and the rain is falling so hard that it’s bouncing when it hits the pavement — and I’m thinking that my favourite is Barbara Pym. Ask me tomorrow — the forecast is humid and hot — and I might say Kelley Armstrong (whose Women of the Otherworld series never fails to entertain and distract). Ask me later in the week — when the humidity has passed and I can enjoy a porchsit once more — and I might say Margaret Atwood.
That’s a bookish question whose answer varies, depending on many changeable factors. But I enjoy answering it…well, maybe answering it makes me a little anxious at the time, but I do enjoy charting the unpredictability of my responses.
But which is more helpful, a positive or negative review? I’m not sure that’s the same kind of question.
Actually, I’m not entirely sure that’s a question that fits my way of reading, my way of bookchatting. I don’t think that I find either negative reviews or positive reviews consistently helpful.
Am I just impossible to please? No, I think I need to I ask a different question altogether: but what is that question?
I find a reader’s response to a book most useful when they’ve framed it in the context of their own reading preferences. In that context, it doesn’t matter to me whether a reader is making a positive or negative comment. The way they express their response, and the connections they draw — not the specific content of what they’re saying: that’s what matters to me.
Rather than read that someone has declared a book “too slow”, I appreciate a concrete example (e.g. “My attention flagged at the long descriptions of the narrator’s buttering of his toast at breakfast in the mornings.”) and/or comparison (e.g. “I prefer the way Dan Brown writes about breakfasts, by skipping straight to talk of lunch.”)
If someone is choking on prose, I want to know what exactly it is that’s making it so hard to swallow, but I also want to know what a reader hoped to see on the menu to start with.
Then I can choose (i.e. based on my personal love/abhorrence of toast and other breakfast-y things) whether I might like a plateful of the same dish myself. Or I can file something useful away to make a meal recommendation for someone else with different taste.
Then I find a reader’s responses — no matter whether their reaction to a book was positive or negative — valuable.
But what, then, is the question to ask that suits my sort of bookishness: how do you like your toast?
Do you ever find that questions that preoccupy other readers don’t seem to fit with your brand of bookishness?
Is there one bookish question that makes your blook-pressure rise everytime it’s asked?
Jodie, Yes, that is a frustrating one for sure. Right up there, to my reader’s mind, with characters must be likeable.
Nicola, I agree it’s worth considering whether someone is actually reviewing or simply recording thoughts; I consider myself to be responding to books here rather than reviewing, with a couple of exceptions.
Lija, It’s like a shortcut when you’ve managed to establish a connection with the person who’s bookchatting, isn’t it. Very convenient!
Danielle, When readers can disagree so vehemently about canonical writers (and about the concept of there being canonical writers), it does seem impossible to think there can be an objective standard of what makes for a good book, I agree.
Sakura, That’s definitely one of the bad attitudes in bookishness that gets under my reader’s skin too!
Thanks for the comments!
Laura, I agree: sometimes a response to a book that someone else found disappointing can prove it will be something you’d probably quite enjoy yourself (and vice versa).
Jackie, I’m looking forward to more talk of toast: How do I love toast…
Aarti, I ask myself that all the time: “who am I to say”?! Each of us just one reader.
Victoria, I sense a much longer post from you on the subject in the near future!
Carolyn, ::passes the plate::
I like reading reviews set in the reader’s context because I find that mood does affect how you read. So then I’ll know when is best to read that book:) And like Aarti, I get annoyed at some people’s attitude towards genre fiction vs. literary fiction. Or people’s attitude towards ‘serious’ or ‘worthy’ fiction. Reading is for both pleasure and learning isn’t it?
I’m not entirely sure how I feel about this–I think I’m mood dependent, too. I don’t consider myself a reviewer and I am not an academic–just an average reader, so when I write about a book it’s almost more for me–to remember what the book was about and my impressions on reading it. I don’t mind negative reviews if they are honest responses to a book and the blogger explains why something didn’t work–as long as they are not dismissive of it and the fact that another reader might come along and love the book. The thing is it is all so subjective–even the critics can’t necessarily decide whether something is great or not. Some people love DH Lawrence for example and others abhor him. When it comes down to things I’d like to hear enough from a reader to decide whether it’s something I might want to try or not. It’s such a tricky question I think and this topic seems to have been popping up all over the place lately.
You make a lot of really good points here. For me, it also matters that I have some connection with the reviewer. When they show their personality and tastes really clearly in their writing (and I mean all of their posts, cumulatively), it helps me interpret all of their posts through that.
Very interesting post. I’m not sure I look to book blogs for reviews at all. If I want reviews I’ll look at Amazon or the newspapers. What I like about book blogs is personal impressions of books even if it’s just a few thoughts or even a photo, and of course the interaction and recommendations through comments. I’m a bit suspicious of blogs which are positive about every single book – especially if they are freebies from publishers!
I’d just like to agree with what Victoria said because she pretty much nailed this topic. As for questions that make my blood boil maybe when people ask why you would read about somebody completly unlike you?
Aha, this is a good way to think of it. I do find myself explaining my preferences when I write a review and why I like the books that I like, simply so people know where I’m coming from. Also, this talk of tea and toast makes me want some!
You’ve captured my feelings perfectly. Over years of bookblogging I think I’ve changed the way I review to take in more of my personal response to reading. Although in my heart I can’t help believing that there is a difference between a great novel and a bad one, I know now that there is an infinity of subjective positions on any one book and that mine is only one of them. Even if I’m entirely convinced of the rightness of my own position (and who isn’t sometimes?) I try to make it clear where I’m coming from.
Funnily enough the question that really makes my book-pressure rise is on a similar point: Should bloggers write negative reviews at all? I know quite a few prominent UK bloggers who don’t believe in negative reviewing – if you can’t say something nice, don’t say anything at all, is the position – and every now and then the question comes up again. It always makes me feel like a big ole’ meany for writing negatively about a book, but I still think that sometimes it is the right thing to do. I didn’t start out to shout about books that I like (or to grind down books that I didn’t), but to talk about books, all books, with my friends. That includes the books that make me wince. So long as a review is honest, and contextualises its response, and backs it up with examples and quotes where necessary, I think a negative review is a very positive thing. 🙂
Phew, this comment turned out to be longer than I had planned.
I don’t know if I give enough detail in my reviews as to why I feel the way I do. I think rather than saying the pacing of a book is too slow, I’ll say, “I didn’t feel comfortable with the book’s rhythm.” That is probably even more unhelpful, but I don’t know. Who am I to say a book’s pace is too slow?
I think both positive and negative reviews are helpful, too. I’m not sure why one would be more helpful than another.
As for a question that gets my blood boiling. Hmm… I don’t think a QUESTION makes my blood pressure boil, but I get annoyed when people act as though “genre” fiction is really light reading.
You make some great points. I’m often guilty of saying a book was fast or slow, but not referencing it to let the reader know exactly how fast/slow. I’ll try to ensure I explain exactly how detailed the toast descriptions are in future 🙂
I agree with you, that it’s not whether a review is positive or negative, but the reader’s response and ability to tell me what they liked (or didn’t) about a book. They may like something that I typically abhor, and that’s OK — it still helps me decide whether I’d want to read the book.