Seasonally, my reading is a little all over the place. On Saturday we had a full day of snow. On Sunday a full day of rain. On Monday we couldn’t open the back doors. The front door was protected, but the walkway and steps a solid sheet of ice: unusable. What’s left of the snow is hardened like cake fondant; fondant I can stand atop… for as long as it takes for science to decide in which direction I’ll start sliding. Today the temperature is heading for a high of six, then falling to minus six, and in between I’m reading.
So, I carry on with some winter books: including Kev Lambert’s Les sentiers de neige (2024), which opens shortly before the Christmas holidays, with Zoey unsure about holiday arrangements during a family split, against a backdrop of a stolen videogame). And I have finished a couple of love stories I picked up in February, but have barely begun Christina Stead’s For Love Alone. And I’ve started two spring reads, about which I’ll have more to say soon, but the bulk remain untouched.
The other day I was reading Ali’s thoughts on Dorothy Edwards’ Rhapsody and was struck by Dorothy Edwards’ suicide note:
“I am killing myself because I have never sincerely loved any human being all my life. I have accepted kindness and friendship, and even love, without gratitude and given nothing in return.”
It reminded me of the ending of Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie’s “Chuka” in a recent issue of The New Yorker (which you can hear the author read here).

“For a long time afterward, I thought about her accusation, because it was an accusation, that I was not grateful to have been loved. What is this gratitude to look like? Is it to be a state of being, to live adrift in gratitude because a man loves you?”

The end of a life, the end of a story.
In choosing books in read in Valentine’s week, I had Bookish Beck’s project in mind (she has links to the eighth previous years in her ninth annual post here): books with ‘love’ or ‘heart’ in their titles.
Ruby Langford Ginibi’s memoir, Don’t Take Your Love to Town (1988), seemed the perfect candidate. To suit the criterion, yes: only not for a happy satin-bow-wrapped ending.
As a Bundjalung woman’s personal story, this narrative reminded me of Bev Sellers’ 2015 memoir and Jesse Thistle’s 2019 memoirs (a Soda Creek/Xat’sull First Nations and a Métis writer, respectively): each of them tells their story in simplest terms, yet makes the narrative so engaging that it’s hard to set aside.
The book opens with a couple of pages that move us through her life, as though through a series of snapshots, beginning when she’s six years old and referencing her three marriages and eight children. Then—she is born. It’s a curious but effective way to tell the story, and I really enjoyed the attention paid to her younger years (which so many autobiographies cut short).
By the time she is a young woman, readers have a solid sense of Ruby Langford. So, when she writes about how her “generation at this time wandered around as if we were tribal but in fact living worse than the poorest of poor whites”, we really feel for her. It’s cutting to share her sense that “men loved you for a while and then more kids came along and the men drank and gambled and disappeared.”
Romantic love was not long-lasting. She writes: “One day they’d had enough and they just didn’t come back. It happened with Gordon and later it happened with peter, and my women friends all have similar stories.”
Motherhood was a challenge too, but more rewarding in the end. “But I was happy with my brood. I still wanted to write a book one day but I had a life to live first.” (These were the parts of the book that I found most moving, but I don’t want to spoil them…even though I realise it’s not a novel, and a peek at her Wikipedia page would reveal all the details I’m protecting.)
But she’s not only determined—she’s curious. She loves again. And, when her nesting brood gets smaller, her world gets bigger. “After the wedding, things were quiet for a while. Now that Jeff was the only one at hone, I had time to read the papers and find out what was going on in the world.” By that point, there has been a lot of struggling and a lot of sadness, but I loved the final quarter of the book, her awakening to the other parts of life she’d missed while she was wandering.
My other choice was Valerie Taylor’s 1957 novel Whisper Their Love (reprinted by Arsenal Pulp in their Little Sister’s queer classics series in 2006): a queer classic. There’s an excerpt on their website.
In an interview in the appendices (which also include some of the author’s poetry and an essay about how WTL fits with other lesbian romances/pulp fiction/classics), Taylor describes her process: writing from the beginning towards the end.
And, so, Taylor (actually a pen name for Velma Young) knew how this story would conclude: she was surprised by the controversy. All I can say without spoiling it, is that she wrote because she was weary of the men-writing-lesbians novels who got it all wrong, and her characters are credible from start-to-stop.
When the novel opens, Joyce Cameron is eighteen and she leaves Ferndale Illinois behind, to attend Louise Henderson Hicks Junior College. I was thinking about the new Mindy Kaling production. About the newer Kiley Reid novel, Come & Get It. We are fully on board with her sense of being torn about her mother’s pending remarriage, her sense of wanting relationships to work even though she recognised the deep fractures therein.

Then the story takes a hard turn that I would never have predicted. And, then, another. And one more. (Many of these matters still concern young women today.) She expected to have a lot of new experiences, but as the saying goes, she didn’t know what she didn’t know. Her own unknowingness is overwhelming. It went from being a book in my stack that I read in the evenings, to one read with caution. That surprised me, but that’s also the kind of emotional heft that ensures a story stays with me.
I wasn’t sure what to think about the ending, even after I’d finished reading the interview.
But, in the end, it’s gratitude which pulls Joyce towards her story’s conclusion.
All of it, all at the same time: somehow it makes sense.
Wow, I thought my weather had been bad! I hope it has since warmed up and all the snow and ice have melted and you are looking spring full in the face!
Talking to a friend in southern Canada earlier today, it was warm and sunny enough to rake the flowerbeds there but, up here, we are having a full-on lovely, steady snowfall (and the ice all melted on the weekend, so that’s not a worry). I’m happy because I love the snow, but I know the chipmunks have already opened up all their windows in their burrows, so I can’t enjoy this for much longer!
I hate to say this, but we’re are in the midst of some wonderful warm spring weather in the UK, plenty of sunshine and not a drop of rain in sight for days! It’s such a treat after what felt like a very wet February. I do hope spring makes its way to you soon…
Valerie Taylor is a completely new name to me, but I’m intrigued by your commentary on Whisper Their Love. It sounds groundbreaking for its time.
She’s American, but there are some international writers in the Little Sister’s list that might be of interest overseas. I htink I have a French one lined up for later this year. (Little Sister was a bookseller in British Columbia whose materials were notoriously and egregiously stopped/inspected at the international border, as an systematic attempt to restrict access to LGBTQ books.)
I love how you selected the books for seasonal reads in this lineup. Usually I just read romance books for Valentine’s season, but this is a good reminder for me to branch out in my seasonal reads selection. Also the weather patterns where you are sound similar to me, haha.
We’re having the most beautiful, steady falling snow today, all day apparently (possibly the last for this season, the forecast seems to be decidedly swinging after this week) and I know exactly what you’re thinking: “you can keep that snow all to yourself up there thankyouverymuch.” ☃️
Nice selection of reading here – and I love the idea of reading books with the word love or heart in the title! Every since I started bringing my kids to the library and seeing their selection of ‘holiday’ or ‘seasonal’ reading out on display, I’ve loved reading by holidays and seasons too.
That ice storm! Our family cottage had some big branches down that will need cleaning up in the spring/summer, but otherwise we remained unscathed. Did you lose power at all?
So often the things we think are important for children are actually simply important things to do–like paying more attention to the seasons, or, paying more attention peereeyod, eh? heheh But we lose track sometimes.
No power loss for us, and remarkably little wind, which was actually a little scary because there is an ongoing wind up here so it stands out when things are still. I continue to hope that these storms will inspire people to make simple changes to everyday habits and thinking, but it’s hard for us to choose change isn’t it.
I keep hoping for that too Marcie – if people just paid more attention to the weather, and realized that our actions are driving these destructive forces (at least somewhat), you would think people would want to make a difference? So many people are still in denial though, my in-laws being one of them. They told my daughter she was being brainwashed at school when she brought up climate change…ugh
That’s a bigger challenge if your husband shares their perspective; otherwise your kids are in a perfect position to help their grandparents see another perspective, one fraction of a millimetre at a time. Your “at least somewhat” shows that you’re trying to find a middle-ground, which is great! It turns the conversation into “even if there’s only a teeny tiny chance that the scientists are correct but you could improve the state of the planet for your grandkids’ future, why wouldn’t you try”. (We face a similar situation but with the younger not older generation.)
I have a book for you for next winter, once it’s really set in, Anna Kavan’s Ice (if you haven’t read it already) of the whole world freezing over, from back when we thought the big climate change would be nuclear winter.
I’m glad you liked Don’t Take Your Love to Town. That ‘simple’ style is very effective at getting a story across.
Men writing novels with lesbian protagonists! that’s just gross, or porn, or both.
I really do love winter stories. But I love reading them in a cozy indoor nook. 1967?! How have I not heard of that? (Maybe just the British thing. I didn’t “discover” Aldiss for many years after he was published over there.) There are 10 copies in TPL, fortunately.
That simple style is also evident in the recent Canada Reads winner, A Two-spirit Journey about an Ojibwe-Cree woman’s life so far: unadorned, direct, purposeful. I think that kind of writing is much harder than it seems. Even though it feels natural.
Hah It’s hard to infer from her brief statement, but it certainly didn’t sound like she believed they’d…done their research!
Wow! That sounds very cold to me, but the view from your bookish window is very pretty all the same.
On another matter entirely, do you use substack? I’ve been slowing adding writers to follow/subscribe to and George Saunders is one of them. Yesterday he provided a tariff-free copy of one of his short stories from Liberation Day. I haven’t been able to stop thinking about it all day.
It’s on my list of things to do in 2025, so I’m very encouraged to hear that you are enjoying it (I subscribe to five newsletters I think?). But, yes, I did mention to Bill at some point that I had “discovered” and admired GS’s post about the U.S. election on Substack when I was searching for the supporting materials that used to be available online for Swim. I’ll take a look for this story now: thank you!
Whisper Thier Love sounds very appealing. I hope she found it satisfying to write.
We’re having a very early, warm spring here and I know it will hit hard once we get back to normal, whatever that is. I hope things warm up for you soon.
It doesn’t feel like she’s writing to make a point or anything like that, but from the interview it sounds like she was following that old Toni Morrison quote (before she said it heh) about writing the book that you wanted to read, even/especially if it didn’t exist yet.
It’s milder enough today that I briefly entertained the idea of taking the winter burlap off the shrubs…but just briefly!