Honestly, it was Naomi’s idea to play Bingo this year and, sure, I thought it’d be fun but it turns out that I love the sense of momentum that comes from checking off squares as a I work towards a goal. (Household Chore bingo? Fitness bingo? Anyone? Me! Me! Me!)
Over the weekend, I finished reading Cat’s Eye, which I’ll chat about under separate cover before long; I’ve written the review, so I’m checking off two squares by turning the final page, the first on each of the first two lines on the card.
On the second line, I’ve finished a season of a TV show, that I approached with the intention of watching only a single episode, for the fourth line (surprise!). And I finally checked the last square. This week, in Graeme Gibson’s The Bedside Book of Beasts: A Wildlife Miscellany (2009), I noted this, from F.W. Champion’s “The Alleged Cruelty of Tigers”, in which the author poses this question:
“Now let us see how man, the avowed hater of cruelty, obtains his meat: can he honestly claim to be as merciful as the tiger? A bullock, fattened to provide prime beef, is driven towards the slaughter-house, from which emanates a terrifying smell of stale blood. Some instinct warns him of danger, and he turns to escape. He is caught again and finally forced into the actual death-chamber, terrified and shaking in every limb.”
Nothing new for the third line, but for the fourth line I’ve written a Haiku, so let the mocking ensue:
Margaret Atwood’s books
Fill a shelf on the west wall
So much good reading
And the first episode of “Alias Grace” sent me on a binge through the weekend. Much has been written about the development process behind “Alias Grace” ; aside from that, beginning with the first episode, there is much to enjoy (even those unfamiliar with the story would be engaged, I think).
Sarah Polley’s involvement was a major incentive for me (“Stories We Tell” is a favourite) because I trusted she would respect the original story. This is one of those instances in which one is reminded of the power of film, because although all of the elements of MA’s narrative are present right from the start (the apple that Simon presents to Grace, for instance, and the quilting motif) the capacity to edit and elide scenes, across time and space, creates a memorable impact…so that the film is every bit as good as the book (only, different).
When Grace Marks first speaks to the visiting doctor—a doctor of the mind, not the body, Simon explains—in the Kingston Penitentiary, she sees flashes, memories, none of which clarify her responsibility for the deaths she’s been charged with, but only serve to raise more questions: nevermind, for in these few seconds, the bloody nature of this business in the past is suddenly sharply real. (This early scene was filmed on location, as the jail is now a museum, although much of the series was filmed in Toronto).
Also satisfying is the attention to detail: bonnet ties that are twisted and grimy with overuse, holes and tears in the fabric of the recent immigrants, and the soiled hemlines of young Grace, all visible in her memories of life before she goes “into service” at the home where the murders would occur. Polley discusses the importance of Grace’s voiceover here and it’s due to her humour and intelligence that it’s difficult to stop after just one episode. (All of this based on a “true” story, lest we forget.)
And, in the final row, I’ve done some cheering. And I’ve checked the final square as well, with John Moss’ second edition of A Reader’s Guide to the Canadian Novel (1987), which contains four short essays about Margaret Atwood’s books: The Edible Woman (1969), Surfacing (1972), Lady Oracle (1976), and The Handmaid’s Tale (1985). (Fortuitously, I found a copy of this volume in a Little Free Library last month!)
Although her other books were recognized as being popular with readers, critics are said to first have been impressed with The Handmaid’s Tale. Even at this early stage, it’s observed that because she twins thematic and stylistic focus, each of her novels appears distinct. Although criticized as already dated, The Edible Woman is observed to be striking “because of the fusion of its two modes: the confessional and the satiric”: “Here is wit, not quite concealing a cry of despair or a supercilious hiss.”
Surfacing is proclaimed to be “more difficult and demanding to read than her others, and proportionately better…comfortably among the best novels in our literature.” It reveals a “perfect command of images and words” whereas Lady Oracle “manages to be shallow and deep at the same time, like an image in a mirror, which is both two-dimensional and three-dimensional”. Survival, Life Before Man, and Bodily Harm are all discussed in the final two paragraphs of the Lady Oracle essay, as if the writer simply couldn’t wait to discuss Handmaid’s, which is described as “wicked, sad and witty”.
Although not interested in “details of her dystopian vision”, deemed “relatively unimportant”, there’s some discussion of the alignment between author and Offred’s voice, observing how MA’s style and Offred’s intersect: “The cockeyed commas, inverted syntax, distended cliches, startling and enigmatic metaphors, cumulative extended analogies—Atwood and her narrator share a fondness for these, in prose that comes simultaneously from both.
But surely just because two women are both witty, they needn’t be viewed as one and the same. And those unimportant details of a dystopian vision feel a whole lot more relevant when they’re remarkably similar to aspects of women’s 21st-century lives. Still, it’s interesting to read these contemporary pieces.
So my grid will resolve in something like a high-school geometry lesson, with two lines complete, the bottom row and one diagonal. The other MARM activities I have in mind for the rest of November do not fit tidily in the grid, and I’ll tell you about them next week.
If you’re participating in MARM this year, what have you been up to? Feel free to include a link if you wish.
If you’re not participating yourself, is there anything you would recommend to other participants?
Margaret Atwood Reading Month is hosted here and by Naomi at Consumed by Ink and inspired by decades of reading Margaret Atwood’s words. From Sunday November 1st to Monday November 30th, we’ll be reading Margaret Atwood, and we invite you to join in! (And last week, on the 18th, it was Margaret Atwood’s 81st birthday. This whole month has been a celebration with books, quotes, cookies and cake!) Check out Naomi’s Update for Week Four here!
Mr Books and I have just finished The Queen’s Gambit and are looking for our next series. I loved Alias Grace when I read it many years ago – will I still enjoy the series? It’s not too grim?
Besides the fact that it revolves around murder, it’s mostly about the lives that unspool before and after (mostly before) that event, so it has more of a period-drama feel than a bloody-death feel. It’s very atmospheric; I’ve not watched TQ’sG yet, but I have the sense that it’s a more broadly engaging drama–maybe someone else can weigh in? (AG moves like The Crown, IMO. A show I enjoy, but not in every mood.)
The Bingo has been a lot of fun, hasn’t it? And it helps make me feel like I’m getting somewhere (sometimes, even when I’m really not – like the cheer square)!
Thanks to you, I’ve realized I can also mark off the “review” square for reviewing Hag-Seed back in the first week – yay!
I love your Haiku! And you will get no mocking from me.
Alias Grace was really well done, wasn’t it? Like the book, I could watch it again. Both have that intelligence and humour. Oh, but I wish I could know what really happened!
I thought it was funny to see how many everyday BINGO cards I saw when I was looking through templates, but now I kinda understand the appeal (we used to do them with the kids too, but there the focus was on their having fun with it–not so much fun for the grown-ups, more work LOL).
At the beginning of the month, I did have some ideas for the make/draw square too, but I just didn’t get around to it (did you? I know that was your idea…maybe you were thinking of the cake?).
And, yet, I don’t think I would have enjoyed either one so much if there’d been a definitive answer for us as readers or viewers. But, I do still yearn to know. So I agree. But I also think I’d’ve been disappointed if my desire had been artificially satisfied by either of the storytellers, whether Polley or Atwood. So contradictory, but shrugs
Same here… I was thinking of making another cake. But I never did come up with an idea, so ginger cookies it was.
You’re right… I don’t think the story would be nearly as compelling if we all knew what really happened. But still!!
This bingo game has been a wonderful way of you and Naomi engaging with all things MA. I think you have done brilliantly. I really want to re-read Cat’s Eye one of these days, I know I enjoyed it a lot back in the day.
I reviewed Moral Disorder yesterday, and finished MaddAddam on Sunday, so I might just get that review sneaked into the end of the month.
Even if you don’t quite make the month, we’ll add your later post to the links. It’s quite amazing how much MA you’ve squeezed into a single month, especially as everything seemed a little daunting when you were making plans. Did you happen to attend any of the Maddaddam events for any of the three books? (I know Rebecca attended one, and I recall that you attended The Testaments event.)
No, I didn’t attend those events, but I imagine they were great.
So impressed with your involvement with MA – I have done feebly with just one book but am enjoying following your progress!
Given the volume in your various reading projects, I’d say one book is quite an accomplishment. Feel free to keep playing with the BINGO if you need any extra incentive to collect some glimmers of Atwood-energy through the upcoming months.
I’m most impressed with your MARM-ing this year! Did you happen to see this? https://bookmarks.reviews/the-first-reviews-of-every-margaret-atwood-novel/ And the T-shirt she got for her birthday is amazing; it’s on her Instagram.
OMG, what a great shirt!!
It suits! 🙂
Ohhh, that’s so fun: thanks, Rebecca! (Along the way I discovered a gift site with a bunch of Handmaid’s merch too. The teenager-collector in me was squee-ing fer shore. It’s nice to have an annual catch, surprising how much new material gets added to the library collection and videos and interviews…an abundance!
I’m making good progress on Cat’s Eye & should finish it soon. I had hoped to read Five Legs before the end of the month, but I don’t think I’ll make it. (Maybe, though!)
But, wow! You’ve been knocking off the squares! Allow me to get another square 😉 by congratulating you (and cheering you!) on this great deep dive you’ve been doing this month. Thanks to you (and Naomi) for hosting!
Thanks, Reese. And I’m glad to hear you’re trekking along through Cat’s Eye. My review might not go up until December, but I’m looking forward to chatting about it. (You can keep playing the BINGO as long as you want to, so your Gibson can count too. grins) It’s nice to adopt a different kind of focus for a time; it refreshes the reading landscape!