Happy Week Two, MARM-ers. The clocks were turned back on the weekend, so it’s dark before five, but no snow quite yet. Most of the bigger trees have lost all their leaves but the sun is shining brightly this afternoon, while I’m munching on roasted pumpkin seeds and thinking about books.
You already know about the short stories I chose, down there in the planning widget, but what you don’t know is I’ve finished reading a previously unpublished novella by Simone de Beauvoir—in translation by Sandra Smith: Inseparable with an introduction by, yes, you’ve guessed it, Margaret Atwood. It’s simultaneously a peek into an intimate friendship between two French girls, from families with different perspectives on religion and status, and a social commentary on how culture shapes the choices available to girls and women.
It’s funny to think of Margaret Atwood being terrified of de Beauvoir as she describes in her introduction. Once someone is established in the public eye, it can be difficult to remember that they weren’t always there. There’s also an afterword by Sylvie Le Bon de Beauvoir, and some letters between Simone and her real-life friend Elisabeth “Zaza” Lacoin, on whom she based the character of Andrée, included and these add to the novel’s poignancy.
Atwood responds to the comments that Sartre apparently made to de Beauvoir after he’d read the novel and dismissed it, as recorded in de Beauvoir’s journal:
“Ah, but M. Sartre, we reply from the twenty-first century, these are serious matters. Without Zaza, without the passionate devotion between the two of them, without Zaza’s encouragement of Beauvoir’s intellectural ambitions and her desire to break free of the conventions of her time, without Beauvoir’s view of the crushing expectations placed on Zaza as a woman by her family and her society—expectations that, in Beauvoir’s view, literally squeezed the life out of her, despite her mind, her strength, her wit, her will—would there have been a Second Sex? And without that pivotal book, what else would not have followed?”
You can also find this piece included in Burning Questions: Essays & Occasional Pieces 2004-2021 but, if I’d read it there, I wouldn’t have read de Beauvoir—so that’s a good thing, because I find her intimidating too.
In another essay there, Atwood briefly describes her life as a young writer. She includes details like which food remnants were most commonly discovered in a rooming-house bathroom when rooms lacked sinks for rinsing dishes and other not-glamorous realities. For instance, this passage about an early public appearance, which fits with Bill’s recent post:
“It was there [Edmonton, Alberta] that I did my first-ever book signing, in the men’s sock and underwear department of the Hudson’s Bay Company. I sat at a table near the escalator with my little pile of books, with a sign proclaiming the title: The Edible Woman. This title frightened a lot of men—ranchers and oil tycoons, I like to think they were—who had wandered in at noon hour to buy their jockey shorts. They fled in droves. I sold two copies. This was not my vision of the writing life. Proust never had to flog his books in a women’s lingerie department, I reflected. I did wonder whether or not I had taken a wrong turn on my career path. Perhaps it was not too late to go into insurance, or real estate, or almost anything other than writing. But then, as Samuel Beckett said when he was asked why he’d become a writer, ‘Not good for anything else.’”
In the same essay, she shares that The Handmaid’s Tale was the last novel she wrote in long-hand (published in 1985) and with a typewriter; thereafter she used a computer, and she’s certainly kept up with technology. Here’s a brief video excerpt (just two minutes!) from a 2013 interview, in which she describes the Bibliomat; that’s a vending machine that dispenses books, as if you needed another reason to visit Toronto.
Speaking of technology, if you know you should understand more about ChatGPT and generative AI, in particular how it impacts artists and writers (and teachers and students) but don’t know where to begin?
MARM 2023 PLANS
Each week I’ll share links to some online sources, so that anyone with a few minutes can join in the celebrations. Some poetry and flash fiction, some interviews and reviews, some fresh reads and rereads: mostly reading with a little viewing and, in particular, short stories.
Launch (November 1)
Dancing Girls, “Rape Fantasies” (November 3)
Week Two: Update and Check-In (November 8)
Dancing Girls, “Hair Jewellery” (November 10)
Old Babes in the Wood, “First Aid” (November 12)
Dancing Girls, “A Travel Piece” (November 17)
Margaret Atwood’s 84th Birthday (November 18)
Old Babes in the Wood, “Two Scorched Men” (November 19)
Dancing Girls, “The Resplendent Quetzel” (November 24)
Old Babes in the Wood, “Morte de Smudgie” (November 26)
Wrap-Up (November 29-30)
Check out this short article from last month’s The Walrus online in which Atwood tests the limits, gives her verdict, and makes you giggle.
(Or, maybe it’s the AI provoking the giggles. Who can tell. And the hunour’s primary use is to draw attention to concerns addressed to AI developers and producers in an open letter that Atwood and many others have signed.)
Later this week, there’ll be posts on stories, old and new; if you’d like to add to conversation but don’t own either collection, you can read one of the newer stories, “Widows”, online via The Guardian.
“Widows” is also discussed in the Vanity Fair “Conversation” with Luis Mora, which is a pretty fun interview to read. You can catch her intonation and dry wit throughout and it seems like Mora’s there for it.
Next week, I’ll have finished my reading of a ringlet-laden heroine and I might have finished my reread of The Edible Woman too. I’ll also have something to say about a short story collection that Atwood recommended in the early days of the pandemic for readers who were locked down and looking for something smart and funny. Any guesses?
Margaret Atwood:
“Another belief of mine: that everyone else my age is an adult, whereas I am merely in disguise.”
And how about you: are you brushing the crumbs off your favourite cake recipe for MARM? Or, are you wondering how it’s already week two, when you thinking it was barely November?
While MARM23 is on a hiatus – Marcie’s travelling, I think – over here in Oz Sue/Whispering Gums has reviewed https://whisperinggums.com/2023/11/23/margaret-atwood-the-labrador-fiasco-review/
and I have read We (1924) by Yevgeny Zamyatin whose latest edition is introduced by MA
https://theaustralianlegend.wordpress.com/2023/11/21/we-yevgeny-zamyatin/
Ohhhh, thank you so much for this, Bill: so helpful. I was so relieved when you mentioned that you would add these links while I was feeling poorly.
Yes, I’m wondering how it is already week 3 when I was thinking it was barely November!
I feel like I’m seeing and hearing of Beauvoir all over the place lately… Rebecca has read two, I think, for Novellas in November and she was mentioned in something I was listening to lately – was it my audio book or was it the podcast you got me onto?
I read that AI article in which MA tests the limits and it did make me giggle. 🙂
One of the books Rebecca read is the same book with a slightly different title, I believe? And I think there is a de Beauvoir reference in another of the MARM videos somewhere, if that could be your other “discovery”.
I watched Jane Fonda in Five Acts recently (you said you were looking for movie rec’s–it’s amazing, the girls would love it too) and there’s a short video that includes SdeB shown in the fifth “act” in which Fonda comes into her own (with thoughts about her activism, but that was actually earlier).
The Walrus offered a really great deal this fall, so I’ve been enjoying that so far.
I read that Walrus article – I think it was in one of Paula’s Winding Up the Week posts, it was great, Atwood did make me laugh.
I’m actually going to manage a post for MARM this year, I’m so pleased! I’ll post next week 🙂
Normally The Walrus is a straightforward news and culture magazine, so I was a little surprised by the humour: a great fit for MARM!
You’ve been busy: looking forward to your thoughts!
Finished my first Margaret Atwood book!
Loved it…and now I’m going to binge watch the series on Netflix.
I did not know that Atwoon is a “Scorpip” (…like me). Ladies, who read books ( in
this case writes books) and are were born in November!
Atwood, M. | The Handmaid’s Tale (NancyElin – novel)
Very exciting, Nancy. Thanks for sharing your link and for sharing in the MARMery. It’s such an entertaining and intelligent read and, then, it’s over, seemingly much shorter than one expected.
Normally an Earth sign doesn’t naturally fit with a typical Scorpip but it’s rising in my chart and I have had some good friendships with Scorpio folks.
I rewatched the first couple of seasons a year ago and here are my thoughts on the first episode, which are spoilery but only if you’ve not read/seen it.
Isn’t the AI article funny? It can’t write like Atwood, but Amazon has had to put a cap on the number of new self-published books it accepts each day because they are being flooded with AI written stories. I have lots to say about how horrible AI is, but I will save that for another place and time 🙂
And apparently it’s created problems for authors whose names are being erroneously (deliberately or not, hard to know?) applied to these works, leaving writers in strange positions of having to prove that they did not write a particular book that’s being attributed to them; we’re only just beginning to understand the complications and ramifications, so it’s good to find some giggles.
Announcing: New Meta-MARM activity: Write like the AI that’s trying to write like MA. Ready, Set, Go.
I read the Walrus piece when it came out and it is good for a few giggles. I find Sartre so annoying, I know he did all sorts of interesting things and came up with interesting ideas and wrote interesting books, but goodness, he’s annoying. I can’t stand him on the Soviet Union and his casual dismissal of the suffering people in the USSR went through. Color me not surprised that he dismissed de Beauvoir’s novel. I’ve gone entirely off-topic I’m afraid, but enjoy your MA reading!
It got a lot of attention at the time; I think we’re all primed to find some levity in these challenging matters. But aren’t you in the U.S.? How are you following The Walrus?
Hahaha, well, it IS topical, when it was right there in MA’s introduction, how seriously he took that manuscript (or didn’t). I don’t know enough about either to hold an opinion but I have occasionally found myself thinking of a literary figure as annoying. As if they’re a child playing ball against the outer wall while you’re trying to read. Like F. Scott Fitzgerald, say, who stole Zelda’s sentences and didn’t even toss a footnote in her direction as credit.
My copy of the de Beauvoir is called The Inseparables, from Vintage Classics, 2021, translated by Lauren Elkin and introduced by Deborah Levy – so no MA – but with the Sylvie Le Bon de Beauvoir afterword.
I see your sources but I am sure Sartre persuaded de Beauvoir she should write about herself.
Deborah Levy, nice one! I’ve read so little about de Beauvoir that I can’t even imagine what her journals might be like. Not that I think one must be interested in a person previously to find their journals interesting. I’ve read Sylvia Plath’s and wasn’t particularly interested in her at the time, only the era and her importance. I wonder if he was dismissive (?) uncomplimentary (?) critical (?) of the technique (structure, flow) or of the idea (focussing on girlhood, focussing on the past, focussing on relationships that’d ended). Are you thinking that he suggested to her that she should focus more on her own story than her friend’s story?
Sartre got de Beauvoir started on putting herself into her writing. My source is Hazel Rowley’s Foreword to de Beauvoir’s Memoirs of a Dutiful Daughter. The first (published) book to result was She Came to Stay (1943), inspired by the ‘amorous’ trio Beauvoir and Sartre had formed with a young woman.
So, maybe then, he simply didn’t believe the focus on girlhood was substantial enough. It was a satisfying work, I thought; it seems to me that I’ve read stories as slight as that about boys and/or young men, so it’s hard to imagine what exactly he might have taken issue with. Maybe he was simply tired of hearing about her perfect but dead friend!
Inseperables definitiely a more substantial work than Sartre’s own The Words
Maybe she should have gotten a second-opinion on her first effort, but perhaps part of her was also relieved to put that loss in a folder and move ahead.
I recently read the same edition as Bill. Interesting that the title, translator and introduction author all differed between the North American and UK editions!
I love how you find traces of MA everywhere. She does have a finger in many pies…
That’s an excellent point. I suppose it must reflect the publisher’s sense that the markets had different expectations, depending on whether the readership was European or North American. That makes me doubly curious about differences in the translations (beyond the title).
Love this intro to the starting – out Atwood. You do forget, as you say, that there was a time like that.
I will try to read the AI article as I am interested. It’s here now, so we have to understand and work out how best to use it. I hope that’s what the article is about.
It’s funny, isn’t it, because in lots of ways we spend more time in the past or future but, when it comes to how we view other people, we forget they have pasts too!
It’s not: it’s short and conversational, meant to entertain and maybe quietly suggest why people might want to get better acquainted with the issue even if they think it doesn’t affect them. (Probably how people once felt about finally accepting they’d need to understand the internet when they’d just adjusted to having more than twenty TV channels from which to choose.)