As usual, Kaggsy and Simon have chosen a year rich with reading possibilities.
As not-exactly-unusual, I have done better at gathering possibilities than of reading them.
Initially I planned to expand my reading of James Baldwin, but the interlibrary-loan copy wasn’t speedy (sometimes it’s a week, sometimes weeks—depending how quickly the fulfilling library responds and whether their item is immediately available).
When it became clear it wasn’t going to arrive in time to have it finished, I started looking around, on my own shelves and in the local library, for alternatives.
First, I looked for Canadian books, which yielded Rudy Wiebe’s Peace Shall Destroy Many, the celebrated and acclaimed author of The Temptations of Big Bear (later winner of the Governor General’s Award for Fiction). Peace was controversial in its time; other town residents and other Mennonites objected to his depiction of everyday life in communities fraught with tensions in wartime (it’s set in Saskatchewan, in 1944).
Hugh Garner’s Silence on the Shore has an interesting publication history; Garner argued with his publisher and it was reissued by another house (some copies titled with a “The”, others not—this is a reprint). He’s most famous, arguably, for Cabbagetown, but also wrote best-sellers. Silence fits with my rereading of Atwood’s The Edible Woman, too, with both books opening in rooming houses, in the same neighbourhood of Toronto, with landlady-scenes.
The Donnellys Must Die by Orlo Miller is a book that mesmerised me as a teen: true crime from a nearby small town. It hadn’t occurred to me that residents of entire households nearby could be slaughtered like they were on television (eventually this story inspired a TV series too, set in Hells Kitchen, but just for one season and not a recreation). And I was obsessed by the idea that the story would not have emerged, if a boy from a neighbouring farm hadn’t been unexpectedly onsite the night the mob attacked (having stayed over to do farm work the next morning, hiding when violence erupted).
Other books piqued my interest as well:
Walter Farley’s Man O’ War (unread on my shelves since I was a kid, but I’ve enjoyed others from that shelf in recent years),
Ousmane Sembene’s God’s Bits of Wood (particularly interesting with recent shifts in French engagement with Africa),
Barbara Comyns’ The Skin Chairs (a MRE, must-read-everything, author),
Maurice Sendak’s Chicken Soup with Rice (a childhood favourite)
and two Ray Bradbury books, Something Wicked This Way Comes (I think I’ve only seen the movie?) and R is for Rocket.
But so far?
I’ve reread the Maurice Sendak story, complete with its simple but charming October verse. Here’s Carole King’s version from the “Really Rosie” cartoon.
And last weekend, I read the first in Ray Bradbury’s short story collection, the title story.
R is for Rocket is a book that I didn’t want to read originally; it was a book on a shelf when I wanted to read something different (and, presumably, didn’t have permission to walk to the library). But I absolutely loved it (and knew nothing of Mavis Gallant’s advice not to burst through a collection stories) and reread it often enough that the opening pages barely retain a connection to the spine.
At the time, the stories wouldn’t have felt old-fashioned, because the small city and village libraries I knew were stocked with plenty of older books. On rereading, the story feels quintessentially historical (originally published in 1943, before it was compiled in this volume), particularly in its dialogue and its imagined future, as the boys rush to see a rocket take-off:
“I zippered myself into a jumper, yanked on my boots, clipped my food-capsules to my hip-pocket, for I knew there’d be no food or even thought of food today, we’d just stuff with pills when our stomachs barked, and fell down the two-story vacuum elevator,”
But, then, I thought about the people who call a glass of water with a scoop of powder breakfast (I’m a pancake lover, oatmeal respecter) and it doesn’t seem off-base after all.
Anyway, it doesn’t matter, because the story is about how what’s been only a dream during childhood becomes a reality, about one of those ordinary moments that turns out to be a hinge that’s transformed a life into two parts—a before and an after.
The introduction to this collection illuminates the parallels between the author’s life and some of the characters’ dreams and imaginings: “This is a book then by a boy who grew up in a small Illinois town and lived to see the Space Age arrive, as he hoped and dreamt it would.”
Thanks to Karen and Simon, for hosting this event, even though it’s taken me a week just to write about a single story. I’ll get to Baldwin, because it’s travelled a long way to me—and not by rocket either.
Best laid plans for book reading – it’s always too hard to whittle down our choices! I find choosing books very entertaining, in fact, I anticipate it. I get so excited to finish one book and choose the next one I’m going to read, it feels like the possibilities are endless…
I think that’s why I love library stacks so much, the idea that they’ve all arrived fresh-out-of-the-box and you could really just pick up any one of them.
Maurice Sendak is always good. Though when I was small, Where the Wild Things Are terrified me for quite some time. I’m over it now, thank goodness! I have not read that Bradbury story, but I do love reading older fiction like that and seeing how they imagined the future. Your copy looks well loved 🙂
I’d forgotten that about you; I’m sure I’d’ve been scared of it too, if I’d read it as a girl. It’s an ex-classroom copy so it was once simply used but now it’s as though each page is preparing for the escape pod, one at a time.
I wish I’d realized The Skin Chairs was eligible. I would have read that! I have that very copy, passed along by Liz. As it was, I attempted Pale Fire and failed miserably. Brilliant, I’m sure, but not the right time for me to tackle it. So I just looked back at a dozen 1962 books I’ve read before.
When I saw you were reading Pale Fire, I nearly requested it myself (a la The Jungle heheh) but I can see where that would require a particularly attentive mood (and, especially with your hosting duties in the wings for November, combined with the busiest of literary seasons) and perhaps October is just not the time. Maybe as a read-o-lution (but, now, you might need time to forget the “failure to connect” too). #readingdilemmas
Took me a week to write about a single story too, Marcie – but I didn’t try as hard as you did to find a book. I love how you provided a little survey of 1962 literature as a lead up to this post.
I also liked your little story about Hugh Garner arguing with his publisher, presumably about, or partly about, that “The” in the title. “The” is so interesting, and it’s fascinating how we tend to assume it whether it’s there or not. Peter Carley’s True history of the Kelly Gang suffers from this issue.
It’s a classic failing on my part, to spend too much time toying with reading possibilities, time that could have been spent reading. Hee hee (I’d love to do the kind of 1962-in-Canadian-Literature style post on Wikipedia that you’ve cited and contributed to.)
The argument seemed multi-faceted but that original publisher maintained the “The” and the publisher who picked up the book afterwards dropped it, so it’s hard not to see that as a detail that took on significantly more importance in the context of other disagreements. I never wanted to read that Carey novel until I heard him read aloud from it at a literary event here; that’s one of those instances wherein the author’s imagined voice for a character meant everything to me (I think this came up in a convo on Lisa’s blog, recently, about whether hearing an author could make a difference).
This new Comment login is crazy. I’ve found I must type a word or two, press login, then resume typing. Initially, if I typed a comment and then pressed login my comment was lost. That might not still be the case. Seemingly, as a side effect, I am receiving notifications of comments but not of the post they relate to. Why can’t WP just leave wellenough alone!
I have R is for Rocket in an ex-library hardback I got for 20c (‘Yanco Agricultural High School’ – I look it up, it’s in rural New South Wales). That opening story stays with you, that intense feeling of wonder, of the future seen from a 1950s (in my case) boyhood which pervades Bradbury’s work.
At least you get the login. On Marcie’s blog I have to key in my details – email address, name, and website EVERY time. I’ve just commented above, and for this comment I have to do it again. It was the same of Kate’s blog recently. On your blog it usually knows me, so my little avatar in there. On Lisa’s blog recently I had to click the login button, and then it was fine.
Yes, I like to keep things fresh, so that every time you “come over” you must introduce yourself all over again, from the front stoop before you can come inside and sit on the couch: first and last name and blood type and literary ID and favourite authors in an alphabetical list. Etc.
OTOH, I’ve had two instances recently, where I had to reenter all my deets for each post, remember me. So maybe one set of fixes actually did make repairs in some instances but created new bugs in others. It must be very hard to manage all the different instances, when each of us has a set of different tech capacities and interfaces. But, oh, it is so irritating and tedious when it doesn’t work.
And such a sense of promise, but not idealised (you know there’s still anxiety because there are big changes pending and ahead and that’s prominent too). It’s a remarkably good feeling in all and perfect weekend reading. And it definitely made me want to reread some of the others too. But perhaps lazily, now that the Club week has already passed. I love finding ex-library copies from those unusual places; I love imagining who else borrowed them.
I don’t know if you’ve started the Baldwin–I’m unlikely to finish it by tomorrow myself–but I have started & I’m finding it very good.
Oh, I haven’t heard Chicken Soup With Rice in forever. That was fun.
I just read the first page to see if it grabbed my attention (alllllmost hoping that it wouldn’t! heheh) but I bet you’ve already gotten farther than I have (a couple of thorny duedates imminent with new fiction from the library just now too). Will you post about it, but later?
It’s still remarkably catchy isn’t it?! I feel like I still remember most of the words once the piano takes off…
I’ve not read Bradbury but yours and Cathy’s reviews this week have definitely encouraged me. Hope you enjoy the Baldwin when it arrives!
I’ll have to hunt up Cathy’s review; my reemergence online has been limited, to see what I can manage in a week, but hopefully I’ll soon be back to regular visits with everyone once more.
A great find for the club – thank you! (and I am with you re oatmeal). Bradbury is obviously an author I need to give more attention. And I hope the Baldwin arrives sooner rather than later!!
He’s almost comfort reading somehow, I’m sure I’ll reread more of these in the weeks to come; you’ll find plenty of opinions about where to begin but I don’t believe there’s a wrong place.