Here’s what I have learned. Again. I’m sure I’ve learned this before and, then, forgotten.
Just because I change my goals, that doesn’t mean that my habits change.
In 2012, I was disappointed that I had not read more from the backlists of my MRE (Must-Read-Everything) authors.
Disappointed that I kept adding to my own shelves but kept reading from library shelves instead, deliberately and voraciously.
Disappointed that I opted more frequently for fresh reads than for rereading.
So I made read-o-lutions and I increased my goals in each of these categories for 2013.
But in 2013, looking stats-y-eyed at the books I read, they fell into the same ratios as they had the year before.
It’s uncanny. And now that I think about it: it seems to have been an inevitable outcome.
Even though I’m not a numbers-gal, I recognize that simply adding to one’s goals, without adding to the number of reading hours in a given day, means that I would have to read fewer of one kind of book in order to read more of another kind of book.
I don’t need to be a numbers-gal to recognize the flaw in that plan.
Because I love discovering new-to-me authors. I’ve just “discovered” Candace Savage and her A Geography of Blood is my to-go read for evenings right now.
Someone recommended Greg Kearney’s The Desperates. Was it you? Speak up: I’d like to thank you. Yes, I do have a copy of Michael Crummey’s latest collection here, and he is solidly rooted in my MRE list, but I have to read a few chapters in Kearney’s novel each day too.
I love browsing the stacks in the library, love being in a queue for something new, counting down the readers between me and the New [Author’s Name]. Yup, I requested five of Candace Savage’s books via ILL (who would ask for just one?). And I just picked up “my” copy of the New Amy Tan.
And just saying that I wanted to read more than 12 books during the year from the backlists of my favourite authors? Well, it’s not that simple. If I’d read the 24 I’d aimed for in 2013, I might not have discovered Kevin Irie, Richard van Camp, and Denise Chong, whose books promptly left me wanting to read everything they have written.
So the problem here? It’s not me. Not really. Not my lack of stick-to-it-ive-ness. Not my seeming flighty-ness. Not my dwindling loyalty. (That’s my story. And I’m sticking to it. For now, anyway.)
The problem is that there are not enough hours for reading in a given day, no matter how I approach the stats.
And as much as I like the idea of new habits, the old ones don’t work against me either. They simply work against the new habits. The conflict is between them: nothing to do with me. Not really. So what I have decided is not to make read-o-lutions until a few weeks have passed, let them battle it out.
I want to see what I do with a gap. Not a forced gap in which I don’t read (that’s how last year began: did not like that at all) but a breather. In the meantime, I’m going to see if, without aiming, I strike out in unexpected directions.
I mean, it’s clear by now that these habits are deeply ingrained. (At least it’s “clear” for now: I’ll probably need to relearn this somewhere ages and ages hence.)
It’s clear that efforts I make to redirect do not succeed. Perhaps I can trick myself into doing something different if I pretend that I am looking the other way. But if not, that’s okay too. Because even if I am looking the other way, chances are that my gaze is directed at some other good book.
What’s obvious: in 2014, I want to read more, more, more.
In some cases, that means continuing with existing projects. Some more Fridays for installments of A Fainter Footprint, returning January 31.
Some more stories in the Alice Munro reading project resuming January 11th with The Love of a Good Woman. (Full schedule details here.) Then: Jakarta JAN18; Cortes Island JAN25; Save the Reaper FEB1; The Children Stay FEB8; Rich as Stink FEB15; Before the Change FEB22; My Mother’s Dream MAR1
And reading projects? I’m aswim with them.
Next week? I’ll be chatting about my foray into e-reading.
The week after? Books about outsiders and exceptions.
The week of January 20th? A focus on families and ruptures.
And, the last week of January, a project I’ve been reading towards for months now will launch: finally!
In February, more of that, with some themed reading for Black History Month too.
And on February 2, the first of my 2013 Relit Award Samplers: did you see the shortlists were released in December?
Yup, maybe I don’t have a lot of read-o-lutions, but I do have a lot of plans.
On the stack now? Other than the three books I’ve already mentioned above?
Two rereads: Madeleine L’Engle’s A Wind in the Door, Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice. The former because I still want to finish reading the Time Quartet, whereas previously I have excelled at reading and rereading the first two volumes only. The latter because I want to read two retellings that have been recommended, including the P.D. James novel.
The other retelling was recommended by my niece, Pride and Prejudice and Zombies, and she also recommended Pierre Merot’s Mammals, which I’m reading in translation by Frank Wynne. So far it reminds me of Cees Nooteboom’s Rituals, with characters that are difficult to “like” and in this case even more difficult to understand.
(Okay, yes, I have made one read-o-lution: I do want to read the books which have been loaned to me and which I have been nagged about relentlessly. These books and their passionate recommenders know who they are. I’m also, finally, going to read Wool. And finish the Hitchhiker’s series. And start the Warriors book. Oh, how the read-o-lutions sneak in.)
Running the Whale’s Back, an anthology edited by Andrew Atkinson and Mark Harris, containing stories by Atlantic Canadian authors, exploring the themes of faith and doubt. I’ve read the introduction and the first two stories, which are amazing. So far the problem I foresee with this collection is that I haven’t read many of the authors’ previous works and they are often well-known, long-established Canadian writers, so I suspect this book will be adding substantially to my TBR plans.
Michelle Cliff’s novel Free Enterprise, which fictionalizes the story of Mary Ellen Pleasant and Annie Christmas, part of John Brown’s crusade fighting for the abolitionist cause. The prose is lyrical, the sort you feel compelled to reread and linger over, and the story is one lost in the official record.
Aunt Winnie, Elspeth Cameron’s biography of her (great) Aunt, one of the desirable debs in the circles of elite in early 20th-century Toronto, at the point I’m at. At times, the narrative reads a little like a social registry, but there are interesting aspects to the story too, chronicling her father’s rise to prominence in the banking world and observing the dramatic changes in “Toronto the Good” at that time.
Okay, so most of those are library books. Most of them are fresh reads. Most of those are old habits. But they’re not so bad, right?
How are you feeling about your reading habits these days? What stands out in your current reading stack?
How did it happen that I – who fell in love with A Wrinkle in Time aged 13 never knew there was more?
I didn’t make any read-o-lutions except to spend less money on new books because my library is bursting at the seams, but I have just broken that one with an order for the rest of the quartet.
O well, 14th January isn’t bad…
Actually, I think there are five…and they are all interconnected with the characters from her other series too. So you might need to add to that order: sorry! 🙂
Great post. I don’t really do read-o-lutions except to try to read more. One year I did actively try to read more from the TBR pile, and did achieve it. It remains in the background but when it’s there I don’t do much about it. I’d like to read-olve to read more translated works this year, perhaps those in the TBR – ha – but I’m just going to see how it all falls out!
Heheh. Yah, they often overlap, don’t they. And that’s where it gets really complicated. Which is sometimes fun, and sometimes overwhelming. Reading more works in translation is one read-0-lution I’ve failed at in the past, but I trick myself into it by following some of the prizelists in a vague and relatively disorganized way, and I seem to have done “better” with matching intentions with reality under those circumstances when it comes to that. *grin*
Yep, I know what you mean. I make all these resolutions about things I don’t do yet and obviously have failed at before. My resolutions are about a version of me I have not succeeded in being. But it’s fun to plan, right?
In January, the booklog spreadsheet all nice and clean, it all seems possible. Maybe THIS year I’ll start reading exclusively from my own shelves, read the entire backlist of every favourite author, read all the prize longlists, mend the gaps in my kidlit/YA reading: yup, yup, yup. All of it. Still possible. From this vantage point looking across the reading year which hasn’t unfolded yet….
Hello,
I was struggling with the same problems yesterday. I have a pile of Russians, waiting beside my pillow, I want to read more Byatt, to get to know E.M. Forster, to see what Barbara Pym is like, or Joyce Cary, to reread Parade’s End and Iliad.. I was almost desperate trying to decide what to read next and ended up wishing I could start reading everything at the same time.. Which is ridiculous… What is more ridiculous is that of all the books mentioned only the Russians are actual, physical books. 90% of my reading list consists of e-books and I don’t have a Kindle yet..
No more complaints..
By the way – I enjoy reading your blog.
Happy New Year and all the best,
Anna
Nice to “meet” you, Anna. Parade’s End is a relatively recent addition on my get-to-know list, and there you are thinking of rereading. Now I’m that much more interested and curious. I’m relatively new to e-reading, but I can certainly see the appeal, and I have added a lot of books to my virtual shelves as well. So far, most of what I’ve read in that format have been classics (due to technicalities, not personal choice) but, ironically, I think I’d prefer to read the Russians in books. Though some of those novels are awfully long, so there’s that to consider as well. Good luck with your reading projects and un-projects this year! (And, thanks: you too!)
The perception of the difference between “resolution” and “plans” makes all the difference in the world, doesn’t it? Sounds like you don’t need to resolve to read – you’ve clearly got that covered! I find challenges fascinating. For other people. I have very little desire to do them myself although I enjoy reading about others’ experiences with them. My biggest challenge is usually to slow down enough to take the time to mull over a book after I’ve finished and write some thoughts before moving on to the next. I am more than happy with a solid book-a-week but the numbers are inconsequential. I feel that I actually read too many books this year because I read some so quickly. I have also challenged myself to read from my own shelves for the first half of the year. And no buying any new books during that time. When I calculated that I have enough books to last 10 years at my current rate of reading I knew I needed to take a break. And because I love to re-read it’s really a lifetime supply, isn’t it? Looking forward to reading all your wonderful posts in 2014!
That’s true, Lee-Anne: the desire to accumulate new bookish treasures certainly outweighs the number of reading hours a given week can hold and the rate at which I can absorb those treasures. If I was to look at the stats on that score, I know I’d find that I have a couple lifetime’s worth of reading under this roof and yet I still acquire, impulsively and compulsively. That’s a resolution I’d most certainly break, but I admire it from a distance and wish you luck with it. No doubt there are some fine volumes on your shelves just waiting for some attention!
I really love reading about other people’s challenges too. There are reading years in which that has definitely worked for me, has forced my attention on books that I would have set aside otherwise, books that I really enjoyed. This year I’m only eyeing a couple of challenges – and haven’t yet committed to any – mainly because my stack of current reading is so ridiculously large without adding that dimension to my choices; it’s still January, right?
I love this post! I know exactly what you mean. Yes, I want to read more from my own shelves but I also want to read more diversely and I want to read the books that people recommend to me and I want to discover new authors and I want to read new books and half do my reading now is via audiobook and… Well. You know.
Have you ever read Malla Nunn? I think you would like her.
Thanks, Aarti: it’s nice to know there’s company in this kind of crazy. As you already know, I’ve got Malla Nunn here at hand. I’m planning to read her soon. Wait, is that planning or resolving. I’m not sure! *grin*