When I first read Moments of Truth, when it was new, I’d only read a two or three of the authors/books she discusses. And reading it was more like skimming, because I was just as spoiler-phobic then. This time, the essays have felt more inviting, more comfortable and, at least at the beginning, most of the books are familiar.
I’ve planned to take two years to read/reread: six of the twelve writers in each year. So far, I’ve been spending a month (-ish) with the author’s work and then in the next month I read Sage’s essay (sometimes another book, too).
For Edith Wharton, Sage discusses Ethan Frome and The Custom of the Country. The quote about how quickly she wrote EF made me smile: “I have to let its frocks down every day, and soon it will be in trousers!” But I opted to read The Reef instead…and soon realised I’d already read it. A couple years ago, for one of the Club events that Kaggsy and Simon host! All the old-style Viragos on her shelf are a bit of a blur, it seems. So I picked up a quartet of novellas, which I knew I hadn’t touched.
Sage writes about Virginia Woolf’s The Voyage Out in particular—one I’ve listened to and read—but her familiarity with Woolf makes it seem like she’s talking about ALL the books. Back in the early aughts, I had a Woolf project—reading through her letters and diaries, alongside her published books—and I hadn’t realised that I’d left it unfinished. So I resumed with The Years (her diaries and letters were rewarding at the time, but they’re no longer on my shelves and that’s fine).
It seemed possible I could read it and Between the Acts, which is such a skinny little thing, but turns out The Years is 400 pages and has real heft. All that detail, all those years! Real historical and emotional weight, but it’s not intimidating: anyone who enjoys reading classics but hasn’t tried Woolf would find this a solid starting place.
Here’s a view of a reader from its pages: “The lines that had graved themselves on his face slackened; he leant back; his muscles relaxed; he looked up from his books into the dimness. He felt as if he had thrown himself down on the turf after running a race. But for a moment it seemed to him that he was still running; his mind went on without the book.”
My own mind’s gone on for years since I first read Katherine Mansfield. Her stories might have been my first chronological reading project, actually, quite some time ago. Sage focuses on The Garden Party and her Notebooks, but I chose to reread At the Bay this summer, in one of those cute little Melville House editions. It was just…there.
It almost kick-started an unexpected rereading project, because I’d forgotten how much I enjoy her stories. But then I remembered how Mel had enthused about Kathleen Jones’ biography of Mansfield. And, wow, am I ever glad. What a satisfying biography! She has an absolutely winning way of handling time. You glimpse something in the later years—she knows just how to present these events, with her expansive understanding of Mansfield’s life—and then she takes you by the hand and you travel backwards to explore the backstory.
Jones’ tendency to highlight bits of letters and diaries really brings her subject off-the-page the whole time, too. So, I not only wanted to read more Mansfield, but all of Kathleen Jones’ books…which is just when the omnibus edition of Jean Rhys’ novels arrived via interlibrary loan, so I had to put all that aside and read those instead.
Sage writes about After Leaving Mr Mackenzie, which came before the two novels by Rhys that I had read (I also knew bits about her from Diana Athill’s Stet because she was Rhys’ editor). As soon as I started to read the first novel, Voyage in the Dark, I knew I wasn’t going to be leaving Mr Mackenzie anytime soon.
It was just too interesting: her narrator’s sense of being a misfit in English society, other people’s insistence that her mother wasn’t white (but she was, the narrator insists), her racialized experiences and memories—it pulled me in hard, thinking about the other books I’ve read from Caribbean writers, since I first read Rhys. (And I realise I have yet to read a collection of stories and a slim volume of autobiography.)
Rhys has Mr James (there are a LOT of misters) muse about women’s unique experience of the world: “Though mind you, women are a different thing altogether. Because it’s all nonsense; the life of a man and the life of a woman can’t be compared. They’re up against entirely different things the whole time.” And, at this point in Sage’s book, the threads of various essays begin to interweave. Writing about Rhys, she quotes a passage from Mansfield’s diaries, and remarks that it would be hard to guess which of the women wrote it.
These classic women writers are so influential that I feel this book is in conversation with many others in this year’s reading too. In Jenny Offill’s Weather, for instance, one character muses on whether their book-ordering history would get them flagged by an imperialist algorithm, and is relieved there’s a Rhys novel to “throw them off the scent”. And another has the habit of looking up their age on each birthday in Woolf’s diaries, because it’s usually “inspiring”…except that particular year proves to be the opposite.
Now I’m searching for a copy of Christina Stead’s The Salzburg Tales. I was planning to read one of her novels instead, because I have a few unread; but the way that Sage describes the stories—“finely worked” narrative patterns, “stories within stories and repeating motifs”—well, I can’t resist.
In the last two months of the year, I’ll turn to Djuna Barnes and her slim novel Nightwood. Next year? Trefusis, Bowles, de Beauvoir, Brooke-Rose, Murdoch and Carter.
Have you read any of Sage’s writing? Or, do you have favourites amongst her “top twelve”?
I haven’t heard of Sage before – at least as I recollect – but this books sounds good. I haven’t read many of the authors you are turning to next – just de Beauvoir and Murdoch. Not even Carter I’m afraid. But I have read the five you discuss here, and like them all (though I’ve not read much Mansfield). I love Woolf and Wharton, though I haven’t read as much Woolf as I should. For example not The voyage. But I’ve read around 7 novels by Wharton and a few short stories. A fascinating woman. Some (many?) of her stories are variations on a theme, but they still work.
I haven’t read enough Stead either. I think I want to read Seven poor men of Sydney next, but I’m trying to track down the short story collection I have which I think is hidden in a box still from our downsizing and I’m very frustrated.
It took me forever to find my books after the last move (and The Handmaid’s Tale was one persistent renegade…perhaps that makes sense!) so I sympathise and hope you’re able to put hands on the collection before long.
Her section on Wharton was good but I really enjoyed an autobiography of Wharton that I listened to a few years ago. (I stopped listening about a third of the way in, though, because there were too many interesting bits about books I’d NOT yet read, and how they connected with her own experiences…I hope to read just a few more yet.) She does rewrite some themes, but I guess because they stil play out in so many people’s lives, the familiar reverberations still work, as you say. Are there other Wharton readers in your Austen group? I would think their books would make for fascinating comparisons!
I’ve never even heard of Lorna Sage. Of her “top twelve,” I’d say Woolf is my favorite and the author I’ve most read. I was in a major Woolf phase in my mid-20’s. Even reading some biographies, which I hardly ever do. That was before Goodreads, blogging, and my TBR list. I was a much more free-ranging reader then, in some ways.
It’s amazing how many super prominent English writers we don’t know at all over “here”, even with a shared mother tongue. But, as Susan mentions, she didn’t live a long life either.
That was probably true for me too…but although more free-ranging, my reading then was much less varied/diverse. And ALL fiction, no exceptions. lol
I know that feeling of reading a book about books, none (or not very many of) the subject books you’ve read. One of these years I’ll have read enough to return to Auerbach’s Mimesis. 😉
I haven’t read the Lorna Sage, but it’s tempting. I will have read a bunch of the books she’s talking about by now.
It’s a fun way to do a project, isn’t it? I did this with Irving Howe’s Politics and the Novel a while back, where every book he discussed that I hadn’t read (and some of the ones he had) I read or reread.
Phew, yes, that would be a real project for me, too, for sure. hehehe
Sage’s essays would certainly be enjoyable without any additional reading (particularly if one’s not overly sensitive about spoilers) and it’s not very long actually (the biography that others here have mentioned is outstanding too).
It feels super satisfying, yes, I agree! I first tried this with two books of interviews with writers (ages ago) and I’ve always wanted to try again. I checked the contents of Howe’s book and almost all of those would be fresh reads for me (except Turgenev’s, go figure) but other than maybe Adams and James they’re all books I’d like to read.
I’ve never read Sage, but I’m very intrigued by this! I’m also intrigued by your chronological reading projects – or even just the motivation to embark on a chronological reading project. Of all the bloggers I follow, you are probably the most ‘project-oriented’, so it’s super fun to follow along with. I learn so much!
If I didn’t have reading projects (and watching projects, and listening projects, and playing projects), there’s a chance I could slip between the couch cushions and be lost forever, and the “Play Next” feature in my streaming app would win the Time Wars.
I knew she’d written about Murdoch – which novels does she discuss and which will you read? You knew I’d ask that, right?!
If you saw the post, I knew you’d be curious: turns out that chapter is the obituary she wrote. I looked online to see if I could find it to share, but no luck. Sage begins with UtN, then moves to TB&TB, AFHD (which would be a perfect selection for #1970Club), TR&TG, TSTS, TF&TS, TBP, and ends with a bit on TFftE (which I think is a favourite of yours?). All quite quickly so I guess next Sept/Oct will be all about Murdoch herself for me really. I’ve got TR&TG on hand and TB&TB, but also An Accidental Man which I’d intended to read in your project.
Fab, thank you. I have read the obituary so it’s good to know it’s that. Any of those three would be good reads, you coudl probably get the three done but no more! I’m starting my next re-read in November 2025 hopefully …
I’ve not read any of her essays but Bad Blood was extraordinary. Such a fierce intelligence, and such a loss. Like her friend, Angela Caster, she died much too young.
That’s what took me to her essays: Bad Blood was amazing but I wanted still more.
What a great reading project! I’ve not read anything by Sage but you make her essays sound really interesting.
Speaking of reading projects, have you read any/much of Sy Montgomery’s writing? I was just leafing through her turtle book and thinking it would be great to read through her books too.
Sorry for not seeing this sooner! Yes, I’ve read Montgomery’s turtle book. I love turtles so was happy to read anything about them. I learned quite a bit about snapping turtles and enjoyed the book, though it got a bit dull now and then. She has a new book coming out about chickens which I plan to read 🙂
She has made quite a career for herself; I’m surprised that I don’t see mention of her books even more often. Maybe sometimes the process of reissuing (as with the sections from Birdology, there’s another like the hummingbird book about hawks) complicates things and deters some readers who would rather see new work from her. (This book was too short for there to be boring parts, but I can see how her expertise and love of facts and details could be a little much.)
Sage’s Bad Blood is one of my all-time favourite family memoirs. Eric (of Lonesome Reader) got to study under her at UEA! For a long time I’ve been paused in a novel that I’m sure is meant to be based on her writing seminars there, The Truants by Kate Weinberg. I hope to read some more Mansfield stories this month as I have one collection (The Garden Party and Other…) part-read. Rhys I’ve never read beyond Wide Sargasso Sea. Why, I couldn’t say. I have Voyage in the Dark on the shelf and have meant to pick it up every year for Novellas in November.
That memoir is what brought her onto my radar originally: it’s fabulous. One of the first books to begin breaking down my prejudice against non-fiction. That would be interesting, to have experienced (or read about) her seminar work. If you ever see Kathleen Jones’ memoir-ishNF second-hand, have a peek: I think you might really like her style too. Rhys is so spare that I can see where you’d need a “reason” but it might be interesting to have your experience of her work as bookends, her last and then her first.
I feel mean with my Salzburg Tales just sitting on my shelves (I think, I can’t see it this minute) while you cast around for a copy. I know the names of most of Sage’s 12. Stead would be my favourite, but she’s not one of them, is she? I enjoyed The Voyage Out, but I’ve read very little of the other writers. Remind me when you’re up to de Beauvoir.
Hah, but it’s fitting that she’s easier to find over there. I used to have two other collections by her, but I never had this one (ironically, as apparently it’s the one that Sage feels is most emblematic…Stead is her fifth choice for the volume). There’s a copy in the Internet Archive, however, and because it’s very short, that might do. I will: I knew that would appeal to you!