Growing up, reading was a solitary activity. Even when I was lucky enough to live near someone else who had a similar connection to books and stories, we never did that together: we played. We might swap books, under the best of circumstances, but we never had our own copies to read the same book at the same time. Whenever anyone complains about the impact of the internet and technology, I recognise how some of those complaints and concerns are true, but how thrilling it’s been to have bookish friends.
All year, Rebecca @ Bookish Beck and Mel at The Reading Life and I have been reading Carol Shields Collected Stories (2004). Rebecca has done a fabulous job of summarising the three collections in that omnibus edition: Various Miracles (Rebecca), The Orange Fish (Rebecca), and Dressing Up for the Carnival (Rebecca). Mel has written about ten of the stories so far: Segue, Various Miracles, Mrs. Turner Cutting the Grass, Sailors Lost at Sea, Purple Blossoms, Fitting Behaviour, Pardon, Words, Poaching, and Scenes. We’ve largely been reading at our own paces, but somehow it all works.
“Segue” is the first in Collected Stories but the last Shields wrote. It was new-to-me and, to begin with, I read it so quickly that I was too caught up with the details of the woman’s day-to-day to peer beneath the surface. Then, I was struck by the fact that, within 24 hours, I’d had to think about the words ‘anapest’ and ‘dactyl’, which I’d not thought of since English class (and hadn’t properly understood then). Jane writes sonnets (her husband’s a novelist) and my weekly poem in Ruth Padel’s book of 52 poems for a year was a sonnet too.
When I reread Shields’ story, I considered that title like the title of Unless, of “joining words”, and how that works in that novel, how it fascinated her. Once I started to look for the hinge, the turn, the sense of alteration in “Seque”, the questions the narrator poses took on a fresh significance. When I scanned the story, these questions seemed to appear in bold. And even though the story itself slanted towards one perspective on the woman’s life, her questions slant quite the other way. It’s an unexpected delight to unravel.
I made a list of 1937 options months ago and landed on these three for Kaggsy and Stuck in a Book’s event this week. First, I love mouse stories and I trust Nancy Pearl’s judgement and I lamented that I’d not read any children’s books at all last year (weird). Next, to include some CanLit in the event: a Morley Callaghan novel. And, finally, I’ve had The Nutmeg Tree, unread, on my shelves for ages, and everyone seems to love it.
Walter’s tiny epic is captivating. In short, he must fend for himself and, so, makes friends with other animals who help him. It’s funny to witnes his perspective on things changing, and to see how others around him begin to see him differently too. Somehow it’s a tender but not saccharine tale, and he comes to see possibilities where it seemed there were none. And I really loved how the characters (three frogs and a turtle are key) share their ideas and strengths, and we observe what sticks and what doesn’t; it’s an interesting take on culture and discovery, which affords everyone the chance to be themselves, regardless of definitions and expectations, while learning to keep others in mind.
For a completely different reading mood, Morley Callaghan’s More Joy in Heaven is a fictionalised exploration of Norman Ryan, the Jesse James of Canada, who’d committed a series of crimes in Canada and the United States-he’s called Kip Caley in the novel. Callaghan (1903-1990 and, Bill, this Wikipedia link is for you) was born and raised in Toronto and, in the 1920s, he worked at The Toronto Star. (Hemingway worked there at the same time and they became friends; Callaghan’s 1963 memoir, That Summer in Paris, includes talk of his bookish friendships and evokes the summer of 1929.)
Stylistically you feel the journalistic tone: direct, clear, and purposeful. Thematically, Callaghan is concerned about matters of morality and spirituality: how does one lead a good life. And, if one’s not led a good life until now, how does one repent. “I’ve made some mistakes. But I found out that the thing I got hold of belongs to me—it doesn’t depend on anyone else.” He focuses on the kind of characters often overlooked in fiction, and the themes remain relevant today.
I’m still reading Margery Sharp’s The Nutmeg Tree and it’s just as fun as everyone has said. There are bailiffs looking for money and women throwing parties. There are headaches that require retiring to one’s room and someone retires to read The Forsyte Saga. Style-wise, it reminds me of Edna Ferber’s Emma McChesney stories: light reading that’s surprisingly revealing of social norms and expectations—and subversions.
It’s always a treat, reading in company. Thanks for the good times!
Reading was always a solitary activity for me too, and that’s one of the things I liked about it. I was always an introvert, so although I liked playing with my friends and being with my family, I also liked/needed some time in my bedroom alone, often with a book in hand. I do like community reading projects, though, and I’ve participated in a few over the years, although as soon as I commit to one, my schedule always seems to go haywire and I miss the deadlines! So I like the sound of your Carol Shields project, slow and steady with lots of flexibility! I’ve been away from blogging for months now but am enjoying getting caught up.
It sounds like you had a good balance of socialising and solitude; I was raised in small places, far from most family, where bookishness was usually interpreted as snobbishness and uppity-behaviour, so I spent more time alone than most kids and craved company (and really had no idea there were other #bookobsessed people). Haha, yes, I know what you mean: there are so many projects that I actually feel as though I’ve participated in but, in reality, my own schedule for reading was a world apart from the scheduled event, so I might be the only one who thinks I’m a participant. Welcome back to online life: I hope your catching up feels rewarding and inspiring!
It is a joy to be able to find community among readers on the internet. I was part of a book group for over ten years and it never quite felt as fulfilling in that regard as one might think. Invariably half the people didn’t read the book, or it was a book I didn’t enjoy, or whatever. I stayed so long for the friendship part of it more than the bookish part of it. I do talk about books with a few library patrons and co-workers, though, so that’s fun. But the readalongs on the internet – those are great bonding experiences!
I suppose internet bookgroups are like On-Demand programming. In a given evening, sometimes you’re in the mood for Abbott Elementary and sometimes you’re in the mood for The White Lotus, you can choose in that moment. With online books discussions, and everyone’s tried to finish for a certain date but you can chat anytime during that day, you’re able to choose the moment when you’re in the exact mood you need to be in, when it comes to discussing a particular book, and I’m sure that helps. I’ve never yet met a librarian who shares my reading taste in general, but I’ve had a few good one-off conversations about specific books over the years (Atwood’s proven handy for that).
I have read only a bit of Carol Shields, but everything I’ve read, I’ve really enjoyed. She is definitely one of those authors that when I get the time, will spend more time with 🙂
She seems a little…quiet for your reading taste. But reading moods change over time, so maybe you’ll get to more Shields eventually!
I totally missed the 1937 club this time around because I was out of town. (In a good cause!) Callaghan’s More Joy in Heaven is a great choice, and something I mean to read one of these days.
I didn’t exactly read the same Nancy Drew mystery with my best reading friend when I was young, but we read them so close together, it was almost as if we did… But after that it was either in classes, or nothing, until the Internet.
Sometime I might make more of a Callaghan effort; I always enjoy his books but I also get them all confused and have to check my log to see which ones I’ve actually read and which have simply been on my shelves for so long that it seems like I must have read them by now! heheh One of my reading friends used to have all the Nancy Drew books, but she’d already read them all before we were friends, so I “discovered” them too late for us to really share in that. That would have been fun!
I hope you continue to enjoy your Carol Sheilds reading. I think I have just read one of her novels a long time ago. I had contemplated reading that Margery Sharp but chose Busman’s and instead,I would probably have been better to go with the Sharp.
It’s one of the projects that has delayed my intentions of re/reading Drabble (on whose work I know you’ve been focussed this year), but I think I’ll get to them in the second half of the year, and maybe it’ll be even more fun to have a little cluster of them instead, after all.
I have had a wonderful reading group since 1988, and it grew out of a bunch of mums after we realised we were sharing our reading. That group is to this day my most precious group. However, then I discovered an online reading group in 1996/1997 and the intensity of our two-week discussions was a joy. But in 2009 I let myself be drawn into the litblogging world. And I just couldn’t keep up, so the internet group, which was slowing anyhow due to the uptake in blogging, fell away. In terms of “real”, lively discussion, though, it was the best because we all read the same thing and discussed it over 2 weeks (though some spin-off groups did monthly reads.)
Now, your post proper! I’ve heard of Flack and Sharp, and both books appeal. I’ve never heard of Callaghan, nor of your “Jesse James”. That interests me, as does your discussion of its theme re good life and how do you repent what’s not been good. I love how this year club throws up such a variety of different authors and writing.
All those internet groups did fall away, didn’t they, sometimes taking different forms before the participation dwindled. I suppose it was the beginning of the attention economy’s acceleration, but we wouldn’t have seen it like that. We suddenly had more online bookish options, so the less robust just naturally fell out of our routines. Really digging into the same book is what yields such rewarding discussion. And often bookish friendships erupt out of the sense that the group members have all set aside a chunk of reading time to dedicate to one book and share in a detailed discussion of it. 1937 was an exceptionally great year for choice for me, and I think I remember feeling that way about another “early” year too (I’ll have to check my notes)!
My parents and brothers, my wife and children,my grandchildren were/are all readers, but we still don’t discuss books much. We do a bit, of necessity, because books are all I buy as presents. I guess you never had the related problem of someone else beating you to your new book, turning the text grey.
I did my Lit degree remotely, so no tutorials, but when a friend introduced me to Lit Blogging it was a whole new world of discussion, much more involving than newspaper reviews (sorry!), and I have been wholehearted in my participation ever since.
Hahaha Good idea to force the conversations by buying so many good books as prezzies! That’s one way to steer the conversation in a bookish direction.
That’s true: I’ve never had any competition for the books I wanted to read. And you raise another good point; I did study English in school, but I never met any readers there. And I don’t necessarily connect with other writers who are big readers either (some are, but many aren’t).
Thanks for these fab contributions! I bought my first Ferber while in Canada, so if she’s as fun as Sharp then I’m in for a treat.
She’s quite easy to find in certain kinds of second-hand shops here, yes! I wonder if I’ve got a copy of whatever you’ve added to your collection.
Glad you have found Ruth Padel — she’s one of my valued poetry gurus. The Walter the mouse book looks so cute! Thanks for the reading company.
Her tone is just what I need right now! It was a gift from an English reading friend, one of my first internet book connections, and I’ve read (most of?) it before, but without the spirit of dedication I’m applying now. Times change.
I agree Marcie – I set up my blog to talk about books because none of my friends or family are big readers. Finding an online community has been such a joy.
So glad you’re enjoying The Nutmeg Tree! I’ve not read Edna Ferber – I’ll look out for her.
Edna Ferber is much better known for her bulky novels, some of which were made into Hollywood films, but these stories are light and fun. They’re available on Project Gutenberg but they feel, to me, like stories meant to be enjoyed in print and this reprint’s summary captures their spirit perfectly.