It wasn’t so long ago that I was rereading The Box Garden (for #1977Club). But last year I was thinking only of Charleen and had forgotten whatever I’d ever known about her sister Judith, whom I’ve recently gotten reacquainted with, rereading Shields’ debut, Small Ceremonies (1976) earlier this year.
There were a couple of decades between my reading Small Ceremonies and rereading. Back then, I made note of 23 passages. Rereading this year, I marked 24, and only seven of these were duplicates. I don’t have my notes from my first reading of The Box Garden in the ‘90s, but when I reread it last year, I noted 15 passages; rereading this spring, I recognized many of my favourites and didn’t flag them again, but still added another 11 notes.
Aspects of a book that spoke to you in another decade of your life strike you differently later on. Rereading the stories of the Gill sisters now, years after first readings and in close proximity, I found myself thinking more about their background, the home they shared (which the sisters revisit in The Box Garden to attend their mother’s wedding).
And I was struck by the fact that, in both cases, I had no memory of key aspects of the two novels’ plots. I’d forgotten that, in Small Ceremonies, Judith does something that she feels very guilty about and troubles to conceal; later, someone else does the same thing to her and she is irate and judgmental.
It’s not a spoiler to say that Judith’s betrayal revolves around a matter of authenticity. It’s not a surprise, then, to find that theme surfacing in The Box Garden too.
Each generation has, it seems, effectively sealed itself off from its lowly forebears. My mother had not wanted to remember the muddy thirty acres where she grew up, the roofless barn, the doorless outhouse, the greasy kitchen table where the family took meals, the chickens which wandered in and out the back door, the thick-ankled mother who could neither read nor write and who had little capacity for affection or cleanliness. Hadn’t my mother, in spite of all this, finished grade nine and hadn’t she gone to Toronto to work in a hat factory?
Charleen shortens her description of her boxed garden of grass when she’s talking to her sister, Judith, about it, in their mother’s house, while everyone else is asleep. About how she really felt about those “first little seeds”.
She dampens her enthusiasm, only affords a brief glimpse of her passion for this project. She feels apart from her female ancestors, apart from her sister, apart from the woman she was when she was married. For most of The Box Garden, she feels apart from herself.
(Just as her sister, Judith, in Small Ceremonies, feels separate from the woman who lives in the house that doesn’t feel like hers, separate from the writing part of her who used to prefer fiction to non-fiction, separate from her husband who suddenly has unrecognizable artsy ambitions, separate from her children who are becoming more independent.)
The final segment of this novel is one extended scene with little opportunity for the kind of contemplative and reflective tone that comprises the bulk of the novel. Charleen’s observation could be about that scene or about her box garden that grew from grass seed:
“It occurs to me that there are some happenings for which the proper response is not comprehension at all, but amazement and acceptance.”
It’s all very ordinary. And amazing.
I have never even heard of Carol Shields! Have I been missing a lot?
It often happens that I don’t remember parts of the books that I’ve read. Mostly it’s endings that don’t stay in my memory but it can be other things too. If I don’t spend much time thinking about the book that I’ve just read, writing about it, the chances are that I am only going to remember the atmosphere, the main plot or subject and if I thought it good or bad. Or something in between.
She’s one of my favourite writers, so of course I’m going to say ‘yes’, but so far the other books we’ve discussed leave me unsure whether you’d respond the same way to her books/voice/stories. The overlap in our reading taste might lie in other directions.
nods Me too. In fact, I seem to forget the endings a lot of the time, and I find myself revisiting all the same possibilities as I reread, unsure which resolution would turn out to be the one the writer selected, even though in theory the ending should be clear. I just watched Charlie Kaufman’s film “I’m thinking of ending things”, based on Iain Reid’s novel of the same name, and I couldn’t remember the ending in that case either!
Hahaha.. We are incorrigible, it seems! XD
Shields on the list it is!
I love hearing the comparison of your notes between readings!
I haven’t read either of these, but probably have them both. I’ve had most of Shields’ books for so long that I think it makes me feel complacent about reading them. As though I already have! That’s what buddy reading is good for!
My notes on Larry’s Party are handwritten, not keyed, so I can’t even try to peek and see how much my reading experiences are matching up, this go-around. But some of them do feel familiar. We’ll see! (If you want to join in, let one of us know, we’re reading Happenstance next though, and I know you’ve read that one recently for LW. After that, I’m into Swann, which I don’t think BookishBeck has on hand.)
I’d love to if I have time!
I love the cover on your copy! Mine has a soft-focus image of a manicured hedge — more appropriate for Larry’s Party, really (my copy of which also features hedges).
I think these could probably be read in either order.
How do you keep track of the passages you’ve marked previously? I remove all my sticky notes when I review a book, sometimes transferring some favourite quotes to a Word file.
I, too, have found that I forget all about the ‘big reveals’ in a book and mostly just remember the atmosphere and certain characters, with perhaps a few specific scenes or lines also sticking in my head. So I don’t ever feel that a plot has been spoiled for me, thus precluding an enjoyable rereading. It might be a less rewarding experience for someone with a photographic memory.
That doesn’t sound grass-y enough to suit at all. I wish cover designers were paid enough to give them an opportunity to actually read the books!
Do you feel like you save a lot of passages overall or just the occasional special quotation like one would put in a commonplace book? I use sticky flags (the narrow plastic ones, not proper sticky notes on which one can write with a pen) and reuse them until they lose their stick, flagging as I read (sideways for a passage to note, up top to make a photocopy) and then, when I’m at my desk, I key all the passages from the flags into a document arranged by author’s name. (This has proven very useful when I return to review a later work by the same author.)
That’s making me look at specific novels differently now, as soon as I finish; I find myself prioritizing the elements of story in my mind, marking the plotlines that I have found most interesting, wondering which of them I might feel differently about on a return to the novel on a later date. Of course, I can’t know that…but it makes me curious!
I probably save 0-10 passages per book and type them into my Word file listing the year’s reading. I reuse my Post-it flags too 🙂
This is one I haven’t read & it sounds like I should. As I think I mentioned someplace else I’ve read some Carol Shields & really really liked Stone Diaries, but there are definitely others waiting for me…
They’re both still easy to get via TPL and they read very quickly and easily. I’ll be interested to hear what you think as they’re fresh reads for you. Stone Diaries, I’m really looking forward to. I just loved it.
Hey, that worked! (Am not at home, so wasn’t sure…). I love rereading some books and seeing what notes I made, though I am very hit or miss when it comes to notetaking. Were the notes in the books? I sometimes start a book (notoriously) and then set it aside. Later I pick it up and wonder why I dog eared certain corners! I have found that a decade in between reading books is like reading a new book in some cases. I will remember one aspect but forget a major chunk of the story. Did you plan on rereading both books together? Did the things you marked this time seem particularly different from what you picked up on the first time around? I wish I was more meticulous about close reading like this. I have not yet read Carol Shields — I am sure I don’t have these two titles (Stone Diaries and something else–should start there really), but I have been leaning towards books written in or set in the 1970s–maybe these would be good choices. Are they reflective of the period?
I’ve developed quite a routine with note-taking and rarely read without a stack of sticky flags at hand (I reuse them until they lose their stick!) because if I simply mark a page I cannot quickly locate the passage I found so meaningful and end up having to reread the page to find it. That decade thing–yah, it really does seem to be a fresh experience at that point. Even though I’ve been saying, for a few years now, that I wanted to reread some of Carol Shields’ books, I think I meant the longer ones that I’d considered real favourites rather than these earlier ones, but #1977Club was such a great excuse to reread The Box Garden that I couldn’t resist, and it got me thinking about a chronological reread (like my David Mitchell and Louise Erdrich reading in recent years, but rereading this time). They are reflective of the period, and I think you’d enjoy them, but I also think that The Stone Diaries is a great place to start when that’s the one you have on hand. Bookish Beck and I are just beginning Larry’s Party if you’d care to join (veering slightly from publication order) and if that’s the other title you have?
It seems that not so long ago Larry’s Party was on some list or other or mentioned somewhere as I was looking it up, but I have a feeling it is not one that I own–will have to go look. Stone Diaries is so famous–how did I not get to it yet….
I saw it come up recently on CBC’s “Writers & Company”: maybe that’s what you saw too? Yes, indeed, how DO we miss all these important books? laughs
I am constantly fascinated by the way our responses to certain characters and scenarios change at different points in our lives, depending on age, life experience and other things. This sounds like an interesting book to revisit for that factor alone…
PS Can I just say how much I love the artwork on your edition of the book – it’s wonderfully striking and evocative!
Books about rereading always fascinate me too, like Rebecca Mead’s and Wendy Lesser’s. It’s a process of self-discovery and re-discovery that continues to unfold. Only recently have I begun to reread books for which I kept careful notes on my previous reading, and I love to see which passages catch my attention across the years.
Good cover art makes such a difference to our experience of a book, doesn’t it. I wish more publishers could/would bear that in mind when producing nowadays.
I remember so little of what I read that even Jane Austen continues to surprise me, and I probably read her novels on a 5 year rotation. i never mind stories of ordinary lives if the writing is good, I actually prefer good writing to good stories.
Definitely, that’s a good way of putting it! Since we were chatting about Austen’s age the other week, I’ve pulled off my copy of Burney’s Evelina. I’ve no idea when I’ll actually start to read it, but pulling it from the shelf is the first step.
I enjoyed Evelina. I hope you do to. Also, it gives some idea of where Austen was coming from.
I think I have only read one Carol Shields and that was a long time ago. I assume that I should read Small Ceremonies before The Box Garden. She is definitely a writer I have wanted to read properly for a long time.
I think Rebecca would probably recommend that order and her experience might be a better guide as, by now, I’ve read them all around each other and feel the sisterhood a bit of a blur, more about the interplay between the novels than a sequence thing. Shields would definitely be to your taste and I think you’ll find they read quickly and easily, not demanding but not light-weight either, with hints of Brooker and Bawden, Pym and Taylor…but North American, of course.