Because I like to have a book for every reading mood under way, at any given time, my stack is an unwieldy creature.
But even with an unreasonable number of books in my stack, only one or two of those books would be exceptionally long.
Lighter-weighted volumes outnumber the bulky tomes, as if I’m afraid that, in an instant, I might be required to pack up and move.
Now, under #StayHome directives, there’s an opportunity to stack the deck in favour of heft.
This year will be remembered for many things. Perhaps also as a record-breaking year for reading bigger books.
From each of these stacks, I’ve begun to read one volume. What would your choices be? (Pictured, or otherwise.)
In the first image, a stack of well-read (but not by me) pocketbooks of the 1960s, 1970s, and 1980s.
James Michener’s The Source (1965) is the only one I’ve read much of. Once I read half of it, and stopped when Jesus was born. (Coincidental: it happened to be the halfway mark and, after all, the volume’s spine cracked hard there, it became awkward to hold.)
Although I intended to read Colleen McCullough’s The Thorn Birds after falling in love with Richard Chamberlain in the 1983 mini-series based on this 1977 novel, I only liked a few parts about Meggie.
One of my grandmother’s favourite novels, Belva Plain’s 1978 novel Evergreen is now part of a five-book-long series (the most recent volume was published in 2010).
Rosamunde Pilcher’s The Shell Seekers (1987) is one of the first books that I bought when I was working in a bookstore, one of many recommendations from surprising sources (one of many still unread, too).
This edition in its thirty-first printing. Ann Fairbairn’s 1966 “monumental novel of forbidden love” lacks the maps and charts of Michener’s novel, but had it included some, might have out-paged it in the end.
Stephen King’s books were among the first real adult books that I read; if I hadn’t already been a kid who was afraid of the dark, that would have sealed my fate.
The original 1987 paperback edition of It (1986) thrilled me to bits. I literally remember petting the cover, tracing the lines of the illustrated sewer grate.
But I never read it. It was enough to just carry it around, to look as though I was reading it.
When I saw the trailer for the new version of the film, I decided that I simply had to read it. Then, my bookmark lodged where it had gotten stuck all those years ago.
I was expecting something more straightforward (like Pet Sematary or Thinner) but this is a more complex story (like The Shining or Under the Dome).
Julio Cortazar’s Hopscotch (1966) in a 1987 translation by Gregory Rabassa has been on my TBR list since I was a student; the idea of reading it has become more intimidating with every year that has passed.
Surely my reading of Rachel Field’s All This and Heaven Too (1938) won’t be spoiled by reading it after having seen Bette Davis and Charles Boyer in the film. (When I watched it, I wasn’t aware that it was based on a book.)
Julie Orringer’s The Flight Portfolio (2019) is blurbed as “exquisitely written” and “an indelible tour de force”. Also, Mel and Rebecca and Susan, too, I think, all wholeheartedly recommend it.
Finally, I have waited long enough to have forgotten some of the spoilery things I’ve heard about Hanya Yanagihara’s 2015 novel A Little Life. Nothing little about it, obviously.
Marlon James’ A Brief History of Seven Killings (2014) is another blurbed as a “tour de force”. Maybe critics need to find another term for an ambitious and generously paged volume.
I know that I’ve read the short stories in The Magic of Shirley Jackson (1966). That collection was one of the first that I borrowed from the public library when I got my first full-time job and was taking public transit back and forth each morning and night.
Even though I do remember the ending of her most famous story, I wonder if the others will feel familiar once I revisit them. In addition, The Bird’s Nest and Life among the Savages and Raising Demons are included.
There’s a chance that reading these will lead to wanting to reread her other fiction. Oh, nevermind, I already want to do that.
Kathleen Winsor’s Forever Amber (1944) has been on my TBR since before I had such a lovely copy of it. Danielle and I started to read it together one summer, but it didn’t fit either of our reading moods at the time.
Diana Athill’s Life Class is a volume of her Selected Memoirs. Some of these will be rereads (I can never quite remember which I’ve read, other than Stet, which was my first, and read out of order).
Somewhere, along the way, Charlotte Smith (1749-1806) and Charlotte Yonge (1823-1901) became a single writer in my mind. To the point where I no longer remember which of them I’ve read (Smith, I think, not Yonge) and which I’ve collected and not read (Yonge, not Smith).
This, the largest on my shelves of Virago Modern Classics, Daisy Chain (1856), is 667 pages long, with an alternate title of Aspirations. It’s billed as a Family Chronicle, so perhaps it would be better housed with the books in the first photograph.
Deerbrook was Harriet Martineau’s only novel (she was known for her historical and biographical writing, as well as works on economics and sociology, with a memoir). Published in 1839, this is also a family story, considering the arrival of cousins Hester and Margaret to the Grey family home “in a neat white house in the tranquil English village of Deerbrook”.
Sarah Grand’s The Beth Book (1897) has its roots in autobiography. “Its heroine experiences all the frustrations and restrictions imposed on middle-class Victorian girls.” But Beth escapes. To a room of her own!
Winifred Holtby’s South Riding (1936) would technically be a reread. Ten years later. But although I do remember that I loved the story, it was a lot to take in. I was reading, once again, on my daily commutes, and perhaps because of the age and condition of my copy, I didn’t flag passages (take notes).
Holtby is the writer I’m most familiar with in this group (I’ve also read 1931’s Poor Caroline and some letters) and it’s possible that rereading South Riding could take me into a Holtby-detour. That wouldn’t be terrible.
I reread The Shell Seekers last month (actually, I listened to the audiobook) and I highly recommend you move it up on your TBR.
I did read it last year (half listened, half read), a little more than a year after this post. (Other than in the title, I don’t think the dates of my posts are visible with this theme. It’s one of those details I intend to research and fix, but then I prioritise other things.)
I just acquired a copy of ’ A Brief History of Seven Killings last year, but have yet to read. I’m hoping to get to it sooner rather than later. I’ve never read any Stephen King novels, but have watched the movie adaptation. For some reason, I handle horror movies way better than reading horror itself. I’ve heard his books are pretty creepy!
Let me know if you’d like to read the James novel in tandem: I’ve stalled in it temporarily because it requires a little concentration at the beginning and I’ve got too many others underway right now. (I mean, I always have too many books in my stack, one for every mood, but my current stack actually has way too many moods in it, even for my liking!) But it might not be your idea of summer reading, so I get that too.
I love seeing and hearing about all these big books! Many of them I haven’t heard of before. The only one I’ve read is Thorn Birds, so long ago. I can barely remember it, except that I loved it at the time.
My mom had so many Michener books, and probably read them all, too. The only one I’ve read is Journey – the one about the gold Rush. I think…
From the first stack, I’d probably choose either The Source or the Shellseekers. From the second stack I’d choose the Orringer because I loved her first book. From the third stack Shirley Jackson – I have wanted to read her stuff for so long! And the last stack is a toss-up, since I don’t know much about any of them.
Did you snag a grown-up’s copy to read it, or were you old enough to have your own copy? I bought this one at a bazaar when I was 14 because it was like the copy that my grandmother had and I wanted my own!
I still have to remind myself that that’s where the Journey Prize comes from. The American ones just weren’t as popular generally on the shelves I could reach, but when I got older and was working in a bookstore, I went through a stage where I wanted to read everything about the north and the near-north, regardless of borders.
I’m not reading any of those at the moment, and haven’t finished any of the four I am reading yet (although I’ll finish one this week), so if you decide you really want to read one of those, let me know! But if it’s just about dreaming along, I totally get that too. You do not need any help stuffing your stacks with anyone else’s reading ideas! 😀
I think I bought my copy of Journey at a book sale. It’s old. And I didn’t even know the connection with the Journey prize until recently – very cool!
Right now I can’t read any of them with you anyway, because I don’t have them! Phew – got off easy this time. 😉
Funny that there aren’t more chunky Canadian books, eh? With all the snow, you’d’ve thought “we” would produce more doorstoppers!
True! I can’t think of many. We tend to go more the other way.
Oh no… now I’m curious to find whatever ones we do have. On my shelf I see By Gaslight and Blackstrap Hawco…
YAS! And Ann-Marie MacDonald (except her play!), Eleanor Catton’s The Luminaries (doesn’t the series look good?), Rohinton Mistry’s A Fine Balance, Guy Gavriel Kay (most!), Wayne Johnston’s The Colony of Unrequited Dreams, Padma Viswanathan’s The Toss of a Lemon, Louis Hamelin’s October 1970 and, one of our mutual faves, Eric Dupont’s Songs for the Cold of Heart (Trans. Peter McCambridge). And there you were…sad that you couldn’t read any long books!
Oh, so many! 🙂
I’m thrilled to see the Marlon James in your stack! I loved that book when it came out. I want to reread it sometime. Probably not this summer, though! This is a fun post. I love to hear of reading plans and see stacks of books, doorstop-sized or otherwise.
I’ve barely begun, but I’m looking forward to it for sure. A few years ago, I saw him at a literary festival and I immediately wanted to read everything he’d written (which wasn’t much at the time), but it takes me awhile to get around to things sometimes. (Um, like decades? As this post demonstrates. LOL)
Loved the view of your stacks! We’ve been staying home too but my work has been insane so my reading has actually gone downhill since April. So I applaud you for tackling those bigger books! I’ll have to stick with my cozier, slimmer novels for now 🙂
My reading has remained fairly steady, fewer books but some longer ones in the mix, but my viewing has gone way down, so I can relate to your struggle adjusting to new shelter-in-place demands. It’s especially frustrating because so many people are watching more good shows/films than ever, so I feel like my TBW list is growing by leaps and bounds.
I don’t read big books but I listen to them while I work – 1Q84 and War & Peace most recently that I can think of. As an Australian let me say of Thorn Birds NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO! McCullough was an intelligent woman but a turgid writer, please don’t waste your time.
I hear you! And I promise not to allow the quality of her writing reflect on Australian writers in general (the only book of hers I’ve read is the short one which was rumoured to have been a rewritten version of an L.M. Montgomery novel), but I’m curious to see if I can spot the elements of her story that held such appeal for the older women in my family. If it’s any consolation, I have Katharine Susannah Prichard’s trilogy on my list for this year too. 🙂
KSP definitely a consolation especially if you contribute a review to my Australian Women Writers Gen 3 Week (1919-1959) in January next year.
That should work as I’ll probably finish in December (they look pretty long and I’ve not started yet). I did participate last year, but I think maybe I was late posting?
So you did! Jessica Anderson. I’ll update my list when I get home next week.
I didn’t think any other living soul had ever heard of Five Smooth Stones. I read it the winter I was in Grade 13 (remember those days? no? ah well, it was an eternity – at least half a century – ago). I’ve always wanted to reread it to see if it had the same impact on me now.
Do you still have a copy? I’m reading another from that stack to start with, so it’ll take me a bit to get to the Fairburns. (And, yes, I graduated from grade 13 too!)
I had the tattered copy I read for decades, but I think I lost it in the move east. It was pretty much in pieces, even when I read it the first time. (I have no idea where I picked it up back then.) Too bad. We could have done a buddy-read. 🙂
If you happen to come across it, let me know, as it’ll take me a bit to get to it!
Very glad to see Julie Orringer’s The Flight Portfolio in your books. Looking Forward to your thoughts
I could imagine you wagging your finger at me if I hadn’t picked up this copy when I finally had it in my grasp!
OMG this is brave, all those big books!!! Are you getting less reading done now that you’re not reading in transit? Or more b/c you’re not leaving the house? LOL
Well, I started with the best intentions, but they’ve announced that the public library system will reopen in June, in some fashion which preserves the central tenets of social distancing, so once my hold list (and the 16!! items in transit since mid-March) arrives, I’m not sure how many of the chunky reads that I haven’t already started will make it into my reading log…maybe not so brave after all!
glad to hear the library system is re-opening for you guys, it’s such a lifeline for so many people. Here in Calgary it’s going to be awhile yet, we seem to be lagging behind as our cases are still quite high..
It’s reopening in theory, but in reality my duedates still read August. And the city has opened up a set of community centres for cooling centres, now that we’re into the season of “heat alerts” in lieu of the library system filling that gap (which was the “old normal”), so I don’t think we’re any closer than “soon”. Our new cases have been consistently in the 400s for a few days now (except yesterday, which was much lower, and that may have been an error in reporting, which gets announced after-the-fact) so I’m thinking there’s a pressure to announce good news without a plan in place to make those ideas a reality. Like the parental trick of “maaaaaaaaybe”?
ah yes, I see. I’ve used that trick many times myself…
Hey–you can reply inline! It’s magic!
South Riding!! I’ve had The Beth Book through my hands but really didn’t like the beginning so gave it to a friend. But South Riding is one of those massive books that doesn’t feel like a massive book.
Good thing you passed it along so quickly, as otherwise you’d be stuck dealing with it on that crowded but still-so-very-contained TBR bookshelf of yours! 🙂
It is the time to read all those big books, although somehow I seem distractible at the same time, so who knows?
The only one on any of your piles I’ve read is The Source. I remember liking it well enough, but it didn’t really send me off to read any of the other Micheners that my dad had, who liked him pretty well.
But I have that same edition of Hopscotch & have had it forever calling to me as well…
Yes, nobody who read Michener really had just one, did they. But the women in my family read them compulsively too. Another that I recall being of interest, maybe because of the mini-series (hey, mini-series were big events in their day), was Centennial. I think there was an edition which referred to the TV series, which proved that the worlds of books and television could collide, and that seemed so special to me at the time. (That might have been another, maybe Chesapeake.) At the time, I knew all the titles but had no context for them, so they just seemed like random words, especially with so many of them being American.
Have a look at your copy of Hopscotch and see if it seems manageable at this point. I mean, we were going to do Miss MacIntosh, so this is like a novella compared to that, right?
Hmm, you know we could read Hopscotch! A mere 564 pages… I was just looking at it–it is pretty tempting, and it really does look like the sort of thing I’d like. (Which is why I got in the first place, right?) Maybe starting in June or July sometime? My Classics Club spin was Plutarch’s Lives, which I’m enjoying but is huge so I should get that off my plate first.
I remember Centennial & Chesapeake around the house, too. I also remember Hawaii–I think that was a favorite of my dad’s. He always liked the archaeological/anthropological aspect of Michener. I’ve inherited a bit that interest, but leaning more towards ancient Rome & Greece. My mom was the mystery reader–and I inherited that, too…maybe more so.
Ah, so THAT’s why you were reading Plutarch’s Lives. I was going to tease you about that here, because Hopscotch seems like an Agatha Christie in comparison to that! Yes, you should finish that first for sure. And I’ve always got several books underway, so just let me know when you’re getting close to it wanting to read it and I’ll aim to shuffle so that can happen. Yay! If anyone else reading this wants to join, just let one of us know.
nods That was the angle that my father enjoyed about them too, which is why, I think, The Source was such a favourite. (There are SO many diagrams! LOL) The ones that were outwardly named for American states were of less interest to the family in general (I don’t think any of them even bought Texas, for instance!) but I think Hawaii would be particularly interesting. Pretty much ANYthing that ANYone did read and does read around me becomes something of (at least some) interest to me. I’m either very versatile or have no capacity to discriminate! 🙂
It’s a plan! We’ll start Hopscotch in a month or so.
I know if I’ve once heard that somebody has read a book, I think I could read that, too! It’s a curse, I tell ya…
😀
Hmm, a ‘busy’ collection, none of the ilk I’ve read in a good while. The most familiar are King’s books which I’ve read several of, The Stand being the one I recall in detail. Otherwise, I’d be drawn more to the likes of Lake Wobegon Days and A River Runs Through It. Your post did bring to mind a saga of sorts I read many years back, something revolving around the Columbia river I think. Damn, now I’ll be trying to remember the title.
My reading in recent years has been more in another direction. I just finished and reviewed The Cyanide Canary, want to reread The Overstory, and am trying to ferret out other interesting eco-lit. Oh, and having enjoyed Heart of a Lion want to get to Where the Wild things Are (Stolzenburg).
Life experiences tend to influence tastes I suppose 🙂
“Busy” is a good way of describing it: quite literally, the only element these books share is the length of their stories! Even back when my bookmark was stuck in It, I had raced through The Stand. I loved the ensemble cast.
There’s a book by Karl Marlantes, Deep River, which is about the Columbia river, and a family saga to boot. I hope that’s the one you mean, so you can stop worrying about it! 🙂
Which reminds me, that I’ve meant to ask you if you’ve read Annie Proulx’s Barkskin? There’s another doorstopper, more along the lines of Overstory. (I think Rebecca, above, has read both, so perhaps she can speak to the comparison.)
Heart of a Lion looks wonderful; I’ll have a look for that one at the library as well.
Thank you, but no, Deep River isn’t the book than came to mind. The book I’m having trouble recalling started, I believe, with a woman in a mining setting (she wasn’t there to mine in the literal sense), maybe Alaska, and proceeded through a logging setting in the Columbia basin with her then husband and son, and as I remember involved interactions with their Chinese help. I remember one small scene where a worker in their sawmill would pass his hand through the moving teeth of the bandsaw. Anyway, if it had been an outstanding read I would remember it better. I can recall nearly the complete storylines of some books I read over fifty years ago (but I have trouble remembering what I just went to the next room for).
I’ve got Annie Proulx’s Barkskin on my to read list, but I’m up in the air about starting it. From the reviews and preview I’ve seen it’s not all that relatable to The Overstory.
I highly recommend Stolzenburg’s Heart of a Lion because to my mind his journalistic style writing is exceptional, making what could have been a boring litany in others’ hands into engrossing and perspective expanding non-fiction. A snippet:
“From the first teetering steps to the inimitable cocky stride in humanity’s six-million-year journey— from tree-dwelling, knuckle-walking offshoot of an African ape, to bipedal globe-trotting pedestrian of the world— had come uncounted sidetracks and detours through the bellies of big cats. Being hunted was a fact of early life that forever shaped the growing brains and bodies of the people who would come to be.”
It’s funny how specific scenes can lodge in a reader’s memory. Over the past few years I’ve been revisiting some of my favourite childhood/teen reads, and I’m amazed how often an element that I recall being a major plot point was really just a detail, but a detail that spoke to me apparently. Well, that’s why ‘memory’ is such a popular theme in fiction, isn’t it. Being so tricksy and all.
The reviews on Proulx’s work do seem divided. Even though I haven’t read this doorstopper of a novel, I did attend an event in Toronto for her launch tour (be warned: it’s long!) and I really enjoyed her presence and the way she responded to the interviewer’s questions. The ending of the event was very powerful and I wish I’d made note of it (but I was trying to avoid spoilers) so now I guess I’ll have to read the novel to see if I can recapture what exactly she said about the process of writing the scenes that unfold near the end.
I like the way that quotation sets us up for some big ideas. It brings to mind a book by Michael Pollan that I read some years ago, The Botany of Desire, which I thought was as much about the ideas lurking beneath humanity’s relationships with plants and how that shaped their evolution as it was about the plants themselves.
Ah, so you’re turning to doorstoppers during lockdown! That, and long series, are apparently two strategies some readers are taking (and thus I was asked to recommend some of each for the local indie bookstore — though I don’t know what became of these lists of mine as I’ve not seen them on the webisite), but I still have to force myself to pick up one 500+ pager per month.
I like your first stack of paperbacks — those kinds of books were a nightmare when I worked in a used bookstore as we’d have dozens of copies from all those authors and they never shifted. Out of fashion, I suppose. I do remember my mother saying that The Thorn Birds was my grandmother’s favourite book, though. I’d be interested to hear how it stands up nowadays.
I do hope you love The Flight Portfolio and A Little Life as much as I did. I’ve read all of Athill’s work now and would like to reread my favourites of the memoirs (Somewhere Towards…, followed by Stet) sometime. Alas, I don’t own them, so that has to wait for library reopening.
I have a copy of that same edition of Deerbrook! I’ve owned it for … 15 years perhaps? And still not read it. So if you do pick it up, let me know — the accountability of a buddy read might be the only thing that gets me through it.
I’ve literally been all over the reading-coping-strategy map in recent weeks. You should give them a nudge on your pieces, maybe they’ve just gotten mislaid somehow.
The Thorn Birds is the one I’m reading from that stack, actually. But I’m only a couple of chapters in. I’m very curious what it will be like. (And working on an essay about reading it.) Did you mother not share her mother’s opinion then? Ohhhh, I just realized, she might not have approved of some of the priest’s behaviour!
Yes, I would LOVE company in reading Deerbrook. I’ve just started The Beth Book from that stack, but I’ll check in with you after that. (That could be awhile, but I know you won’t mind!)
I much prefer novellas to doorstoppers although I did read an excellent one a couple of weeks ago: Stuart Evers’ The Blind Light, published here in June.
The Evers sounds very good, thank you. The description reminds me of Jeffrey Eugenides’ Middlesex somehow, perhaps for its beginning mid-20th-C.
I’ve not gotten into reading big books lately. I have more of a sense of accomplishment when I can manage shorter ones. But that may change.
I have the Library of America volume of Shirley Jackson which I have been eyeing – unlike you I’ve read the novels but not the short stories. Either way I’m sure they will not disappoint.
At first I was much more interested in shorter works as well, but, as time has passed, the bigger books have taken on a fresh appeal. I didn’t know there was a LoA volume for Jackson; I bet there’s some great supplementary matierla in there!
Wow, what a lovely pile of big books. I have been considering using lockdown to read the new Hilary Mantel, which is huge, but haven’t taken the plunge yet in buying it.
I would definitely recommend Diana Athill, I love her memoirs so much. The Shirley Jackson collection looks fantastic too, I have read a different collection of her shorter work, though only two of her novels. South Riding is one of my favourite Virago books so definitely worth a re-read.
I had your recent post about Athill’s short stories in mind when I slipped this one into the stack. She should probably be on my MRE list!
Have you seen the film (TV?) adaptation of SR? I’m hoping that will be available too.
I did watch the TV adaptation of South Riding, it was very good.
That is a lot of big books!!! Oddly, I’ve recently read a much slimmer book by Sarah Grand which I really enjoyed – so I’ll be interested in your thoughts on The Beth Book!
I didn’t even realize she’d written anything else: The Beth Book is so monstrous that it seems it could have absorbed a lifetime’s worth of writing energy. Thank you for letting me know!